atlas

Research map / Bandits and online learning / Multi-armed bandits

Combinatorial Multivariant Multi-Armed Bandits with Applications to Episodic Reinforcement Learning and Beyond

ICML 2024 · Bandits and online learning › Multi-armed bandits · approach: Non-stationary and structured-reward bandits · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces CMAB-MT, a combinatorial bandit framework with multivariate arm outcomes and probabilistic arm triggering, with a 1-norm smoothness condition and the CUCB-MT algorithm, and applies it to episodic RL and probabilistic maximum coverage for goods distribution to obtain matching or improved regret bounds.

Problem

Existing combinatorial bandits with probabilistically triggered arms treat each arm outcome as univariate, so they cannot exploit the statistical structure of multivariate outcomes such as transitions in episodic RL or indivisible goods distribution, leading to suboptimal regret.

Approach

Generalizes CMAB-T to d-dimensional multivariate arm outcomes, defines a weighted 1-norm triggering-probability-modulated smoothness condition, builds action-dependent confidence regions, and models episodic RL as a CMAB-MT instance where each transition kernel is an arm and occupancy measures are triggering probabilities.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use value-function-related MTPM+ weights and variance-aware confidence regions instead of constant weightsCUCB-MT for episodic RL · Episodic RLregret upper bound: \tilde{O}(\sqrt{H^4S^2AT}) -> O(\sqrt{H^3SAT\log (SAHT)}+H^3S^2A\log^{3/2} (SAHT))Helped
Apply sharp CMAB analysis to the value-function-weighted episodic RL methodCUCB-MT for episodic RL · Episodic RLleading regret term: O \left(\sqrt{H^3SAT\log^5 (SAHT)}\right) -> O\left(\sqrt{H^3SAT\log (SAHT)}\right)Helped
Use multivariant arms for indivisible-goods outcomes instead of the CUCB-T formulationCUCB-MT for PMC-GD · PMC-GDregret upper bound: \tilde{O}(\sqrt{k|U||V|^2T}) -> \tilde{O}(\sqrt{k|U||V|T}); factor of \tilde{O}(\sqrt{V})Helped
Use CUCB-MT for PMC-GD instead of variance-adaptive algorithmsCUCB-MT · PMC-GDregret upper bound: \tilde{O}(\sqrt{|U||V|^2T}) -> \tilde{O}(\sqrt{k|U||V|T}); factor of \tilde{O}(\sqrt{|V|/k})Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: gap-dependent regret gap-independent regret approximate regret

Baselines: CUCB-T UCRL2 UCBVI Zhang et al. variance-adaptive CMAB-T algorithm Zhang et al. gap-dependent clipping RL algorithm

Builds on: CMAB-T UCRL2 UCB-VI Azar et al. optimistic value iteration CUCB

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy