atlas

Research map / 3D vision / NeRF and radiance fields

Robust Inverse Graphics via Probabilistic Inference

ICML 2024 · 3D vision › NeRF and radiance fields · approach: Inverse rendering with neural fields · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes robust inverse graphics (RIG), which performs full Bayesian posterior inference over a NeRF scene prior and a NeRF corruption model with an improper uniform prior, plus ReGAL diffusion conditioning with auxiliary latents, for single-image depth estimation under rain, cloud, and FOV corruptions.

Problem

Inferring 3D scenes from a single image robust to unknown corruptions (rain, clouds/fog, floaters, camera FOV errors) without knowing the corruption family ahead of time; MAP estimation yields degenerate 'billboard' corruption solutions.

Approach

Treat corruptions as a secondary NeRF with an uninformative uniform prior and perform full posterior inference (variational inference for ProbNeRF; ReGAL importance sampling/SMC for diffusion priors) over scene and corruption jointly, rather than MAP, which avoids billboard solutions; also introduces ReGAL, a diffusion conditioning method for models with auxiliary latents.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use full posterior variational inference instead of MAP point estimationProbNeRF · ShapeNet rainVSD: 0.43 ± 0.0044 -> 0.32 ± 0.0039Helped
Use full posterior variational inference instead of MAP point estimationProbNeRF · ShapeNet cloudVSD: 0.48 ± 0.0042 -> 0.45 ± 0.0043Helped
Use full posterior variational inference instead of MAP point estimationProbNeRF · ShapeNet FOVVSD: 0.46 ± 0.0047 -> 0.36 ± 0.004Helped
Use full posterior variational inference instead of MAP point estimationProbNeRF · ShapeNet cleanPSNR: 27.08 ± 0.17 -> 27.11 ± 0.2No clear effect
Increase ReGAL importance samples from K=1 to K=8 (ablation)SSDNeRF ReGAL · ShapeNet FOVVSD: 0.49 ± 0.0052 -> 0.34 ± 0.0041Helped
Increase ReGAL importance samples from K=1 to K=8 (ablation)SSDNeRF ReGAL · MultiShapeNet FOVVSD: 0.95 ± 0.0013 -> 0.95 ± 0.0013No clear effect
Increase ReGAL importance samples from K=1 to K=8 (ablation)SSDNeRF ReGAL · MultiShapeNet rainPSNR: 19.01 ± 0.38 -> 15.65 ± 0.34Hurt
Use ReGAL with SSDNeRF rather than DPTmonocular depth estimation · ShapeNet rainVSD: 0.63 ± 0.0065 -> 0.25 ± 0.0027Helped
Use ReGAL with SSDNeRF rather than DPTmonocular depth estimation · MultiShapeNet FOVVSD: 0.92 ± 0.0031 -> 0.95 ± 0.0013Hurt
Use ReGAL with SSDNeRF rather than DPTmonocular depth estimation · MultiShapeNet cleanVSD: 0.91 ± 0.0037 -> 0.87 ± 0.0015Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ShapeNet cars MultiShapeNet

Benchmarks: ShapeNet cars (corrupted rain, cloud, FOV) MultiShapeNet (corrupted rain, cloud, FOV)

Metrics: VSD PSNR

Baselines: DPT ProbNeRF MAP

Builds on: ProbNeRF SSDNeRF reconstruction guidance RealNVP DPT

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy