atlas

Research map / 3D vision / Face and shape

Learning Implicit Representation for Reconstructing Articulated Objects

ICLR 2024 · 3D vision › Face and shape · approach: Pixel-aligned implicit human and hand reconstruction · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Learns an implicit skeleton (bones, skinning weights, rigidity coefficients, transformations) alongside explicit mesh/camera representations from monocular videos without 3D supervision, via an EM-like SIOS^2 algorithm.

Problem

Reconstructing 3D shape and motion of articulated objects from monocular or multi-view videos without category-specific skeletal templates or 3D supervision.

Approach

Treats an articulated object as an unknown semi-rigid skeleton covered by nonrigid skin; learns skeleton via mesh contraction initialization and iterative refinement guided by optical-flow-based bone motion and bone-length constancy, plus a Dynamic Rigidity loss that replaces ARAP with entropy-based per-edge rigidity coefficients.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add the learned skeleton and implicit representationLIMR compared with LASR · DAVIS2D keypoint transfer accuracy: 71.9 -> 80.2Helped
Add the learned skeleton and implicit representationLIMR compared with LASR · PlanetZoo2D keypoint transfer accuracy: 66.9 -> 69.9Helped
Add Dynamic Rigidity instead of ARAP (ablation)LIMR · DAVIS2D keypoint transfer accuracy: 78.5 -> 80.2Helped
Add Dynamic Rigidity instead of ARAP (ablation)LIMR · PlanetZoo2D keypoint transfer accuracy: 68.2 -> 69.9Helped
Use the learned skeleton and implicit representationLIMR compared with BANMo · AMA-sambaChamfer Distance (cm): 15.3 -> 13.1Helped
Use the learned skeleton and implicit representationLIMR compared with BANMo · AMA averageChamfer Distance (cm): 14.6 -> 12.9Helped
Use the learned skeleton and implicit representationLIMR compared with BANMo · AMA averageF@2%: 53.9 -> 55.8Helped
Use the learned skeleton and implicit representationLIMR compared with BANMo · AMA averagemIoU: 61.8 -> 62.5Helped
Vary the skeleton-merging threshold t_o between 0.99 and 0.85 (ablation)LIMR · reconstruction resultsreconstruction performanceNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: DAVIS BADJA PlanetZoo AMA BANMo casual videos

Benchmarks: BADJA PlanetZoo AMA swing and samba

Metrics: PCK-T (2D keypoint transfer accuracy) 3D Chamfer distance F-score mIoU

Baselines: LASR ViSER BANMo RigNet

Builds on: LASR BANMo ViSER As-Rigid-As-Possible loss

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy