atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Robot action and navigation

Mitigating the Human-Robot Domain Discrepancy in Visual Pre-training for Robotic Manipulation

CVPR 2025 · Vision-language and multimodal › Robot action and navigation · approach: Memory and subgoal-based manipulation · 7 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Adapts human-data pre-trained visual encoders (R3M, D4R) to the robot domain with parameter-efficient adapters trained via a human-robot contrastive alignment loss on paired RH20T demonstrations, improving manipulation success on Adroit, RLBench, and real-world tasks.

Problem

Visual representations pre-trained on human activity videos transfer poorly to robotic manipulation because of the morphological human-robot domain discrepancy, and existing fixes either lack robot data or require per-environment customization.

Approach

Use paired human-robot demonstrations as bridges: insert lightweight adapters into a frozen human-pretrained encoder and train them on robot videos with a contrastive loss that aligns adapted robot features with frozen human features (and task-aware text-queried attention pooling), keeping the backbone versatile.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Apply HR-Align adaptation to D4RD4R · Adroitaverage success rate: 63.0 -> 65.0 (+2.0)Helped
Apply HR-Align adaptation to R3MR3M · Adroitaverage success rate: 74.0 -> 81.3 (+7.3)Helped
Apply HR-Align adaptation to D4RD4R · RLBench 18-task averagesuccess rate: 55.3 -> 59.9 (+4.6)Helped
Apply HR-Align adaptation to R3MR3M · RLBench 18-task averagesuccess rate: 50.3 -> 59.2 (+8.9)Helped
Fully fine-tune on paired robot videos using the original pre-training objectiveR3M · Adroitaverage success rate: 74.0 -> 77.7 (+3.7)Helped
Fully fine-tune on paired robot videos with action-category classificationR3M · Adroitaverage success rate: 74.0 -> 77.3 (+3.3)Helped
Insert an adapter before the first backbone block (ablation)R3M-Align · Adroitaverage success rate: 74.0 -> 79.6 (+5.6)Helped
Insert an adapter in the middle of the backbone blocks (ablation)R3M-Align · Adroitaverage success rate: 74.0 -> 81.3 (+7.3)Helped
Insert an adapter after the last backbone block (ablation)R3M-Align · Adroitaverage success rate: 74.0 -> 81.3 (+7.3)Helped
Insert adapters before, in the middle of, and after the backbone blocks (ablation)R3M-Align · Adroitaverage success rate: 74.0 -> 80.3 (+6.3)Helped
Use adapters at all three backbone positions instead of only after the last block (ablation)R3M-Align · Adroitaverage success rate: 81.3 -> 80.3Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: RH20T Ego4D Kinetics Adroit RLBench

Benchmarks: Adroit RLBench real-world xArm7 tasks

Metrics: success rate average success rate t-SNE feature distribution

Baselines: R3M D4R R3M-PreT R3M-ClS RVT

Builds on: R3M data4robotics RVT ACT

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy