atlas

Research map / 3D vision / 3D generation

MVBoost: Boost 3D Reconstruction with Multi-View Refinement

CVPR 2025 · 3D vision › 3D generation · approach: Diffusion-based novel view synthesis · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Builds a pseudo-GT multi-view dataset from single images (Era3D multi-view diffusion + LGM reconstruction + refinement) to train a LoRA-adapted feed-forward 3DGS reconstruction model, plus a per-input-view LPIPS pose/alignment optimization.

Problem

Feed-forward single-image 3D reconstruction is limited by scarce high-quality 3D training data, and multi-view diffusion outputs used at inference are often inconsistent across views.

Approach

Combine the accuracy of a multi-view diffusion model with the cross-view consistency of a large 3D reconstruction model: reconstruct 3DGS from diffusion views, render views from it, refine them with diffusion at a partial noise strength, and train a LoRA-adapted LGM on these 2D-derived pseudo-GT views, followed by input-view LPIPS optimization.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Apply MVBoost instead of VFusion3DSingle-view 3D reconstruction · GSO orbiting viewsPSNR: 17.416 -> 18.561Helped
Apply MVBoost instead of VFusion3DSingle-view 3D reconstruction · GSO orbiting viewsSSIM: 0.846 -> 0.859Helped
Apply MVBoost instead of VFusion3DSingle-view 3D reconstruction · GSO orbiting viewsLPIPS: 0.155 -> 0.131Helped
Apply MVBoost instead of TriplaneGaussianSingle-view 3D reconstruction · GSOCD: 0.12132 -> 0.10110Helped
Apply MVBoost instead of InstantMeshSingle-view 3D reconstruction · GSOF-Score: 0.7369 -> 0.7977Helped
Set refinement strength to 0.95 rather than using original views (ablation)MVBoost multi-view refinement · GSOPSNR: 17.811 -> 19.132Helped
Vary refinement strength from 0.10 to 1.00 (ablation)MVBoost multi-view refinement · GSOPSNR: 17.798; 17.76; 17.80; 18.27; 19.132; 18.583Mixed
Train with refinement strength 0.95 rather than original supervision (ablation)MVBoost reconstruction model · GSOPSNR: 17.851 -> 18.093Helped
Vary refinement strength used for supervision from 0.10 to 1.00 (ablation)MVBoost reconstruction model · GSOPSNR: 17.624; 17.764; 17.904; 18.021; 18.093; 18.053Mixed
Increase training data from 10K to 100K (ablation)MVBoost reconstruction model · GSOPSNR: 17.212 -> 18.561Helped
Apply input view optimization (ablation)MVBoost · GSO input viewLPIPS: 0.108 -> 0.002Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: GSO Omni3D (supplementary) synthetic 100k object images generated via LayerDiffuse

Benchmarks: Google Scanned Objects (GSO)

Metrics: PSNR SSIM LPIPS CD F-Score

Baselines: OpenLRM VFusion3D CRM InstantMesh TriplaneGaussian LGM

Builds on: LGM Era3D LoRA Zero123 LayerDiffuse

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy