atlas

Research map / 3D vision / 3D generation

View Transformation Robustness for Multi-View 3D Object Reconstruction with Reconstruction Error-Guided View Selection

AAAI 2025 · 3D vision › 3D generation · approach: Feed-forward 3D asset generation and editing · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes reconstruction error-guided view selection, with Zero-1-to-3 view synthesis and iterative fine-tuning, to improve view transformation robustness of voxel-based multi-view 3D reconstruction models, and introduces the ShapeNet-VTR dataset.

Problem

Deep multi-view 3D object reconstruction models degrade sharply when test inputs come from viewpoints far from the training distribution (view transformation robustness), and existing augmentation with random views is inefficient.

Approach

Project the 3D reconstruction error voxels onto candidate viewpoints, select the views covering the most error mass, sample around them, and synthesize those views with Zero-1-to-3 to fine-tune the reconstruction model iteratively, using a category-level viewpoint pool.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use reconstruction error-guided view selection and synthesized views instead of the strongest CNN VTR baselinePix2Vox++ · ShapeNet-VTR HemisphericalmIoU: 51.50% -> 53.53%Helped
Use reconstruction error-guided view selection and synthesized views instead of the strongest CNN VTR baselinePix2Vox++ · ShapeNet-VTR SphericalmIoU: 41.62% -> 46.12%Helped
Use reconstruction error-guided view selection and synthesized views instead of the strongest transformer VTR baselineLRGT · ShapeNet-VTR HemisphericalmIoU: 56.07% -> 57.11%Helped
Use reconstruction error-guided view selection and synthesized views instead of the strongest transformer VTR baselineLRGT · ShapeNet-VTR SphericalmIoU: 44.70% -> 44.97%Helped
Set view-selection interval K to 15° instead of 30° (ablation)Pix2Vox++ with the proposed method · ShapeNet-VTR SphericalmIoU: 46.12% -> 43.27%Hurt
Set view-selection interval K to 60° instead of 30° (ablation)Pix2Vox++ with the proposed method · ShapeNet-VTR SphericalmIoU: 46.12% -> 45.03%Hurt
Set view-selection interval K to 90° instead of 30° (ablation)Pix2Vox++ with the proposed method · ShapeNet-VTR SphericalmIoU: 46.12% -> 44.26%Hurt
Add the viewpoint pool (ablation)Pix2Vox++ with the proposed method · ShapeNet-VTR SphericalmIoU: 42.39% -> 46.12%Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ShapeNet ShapeNet-VTR Pix3D SUN dataset

Benchmarks: ShapeNet-VTR Pix3D

Metrics: mIoU F-score

Baselines: Pix2Vox++ GARNet UMIFormer LRGT Nature augmentation Random augmentation VIAT MVTN OCCNet

Builds on: Pix2Vox++ LRGT Zero-1-to-3 VIAT MVTN

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy