Research map / Image generation / Autoregressive and latent generation
MEAT: Multiview Diffusion Model for Human Generation on Megapixels with Mesh Attention
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Proposes MEAT, a megapixel (1024x1024) multiview diffusion model for human novel-view generation that uses mesh attention over a monocular clothed-human mesh, plus keypoint conditioning and DNA-Rendering motion videos as training data.
Problem
Multiview diffusion models for human image-to-multiview generation fail to produce detailed, consistent results because dense cross-view attention does not scale to megapixel resolutions, and high-quality multiview human scan data is scarce.
Approach
Mesh attention uses rasterization and projection of a coarse clothed-human mesh to find direct cross-view pixel correspondences, so each pixel attends only to a small set of matched pixels in other views, reducing attention complexity; combined with keypoint conditioning, multi-scale VAE reference features, and a linear noise schedule, and training on multiview human motion videos.
Key results
- At 1024 resolution, MEAT reaches P-FID 10.60 and LPIPS 0.0751 versus 59.79 P-FID and 0.1456 LPIPS for Wonder3D (inference checkpoint, 256 resolution).
- Wonder3D retrained with keypoints achieves the best PPLC among methods in Table 2 (0.0895), with MEAT close behind (0.0928 at 1024 in the ablation table).
- Mesh attention at 1024 resolution uses 68/52 GB train/inference memory versus 186/471 GB for dense multiview attention, and is the only one trainable at 1024 among those compared.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Increase training resolution to 1024 (ablation) | Stable Zero123 · DNA-Rendering Part 1, 1024 resolution | PSNR: 17.51 -> 14.41 | Hurt |
| Use the linear noise schedule (ablation) | Stable Zero123 at 1024 resolution · DNA-Rendering Part 1, 1024 resolution | PSNR: 14.41 -> 16.56 | Helped |
| Add keypoint conditioning (ablation) | Stable Zero123 at 1024 resolution · DNA-Rendering Part 1, 1024 resolution | PSNR: 16.56 -> 18.78 | Helped |
| Add VAE mesh attention (ablation) | MEAT · DNA-Rendering Part 1, 1024 resolution | PSNR: 18.50 -> 18.91 | Helped |
| Train U-Net first, then freeze it and train mesh attention (ablation) | MEAT · DNA-Rendering Part 1, 1024 resolution | FID: 17.08 -> 15.37 | Helped |
| Train U-Net first, then freeze it and train mesh attention (ablation) | MEAT · DNA-Rendering Part 1, 1024 resolution | PPLC: 0.0928 -> 0.0973 | Hurt |
| Replace mesh attention with dense multiview attention (ablation) | MEAT · DNA-Rendering Part 1, 1024 resolution | P-FID: 10.60 -> 37.34 | Hurt |
| Replace mesh attention with epipolar attention (ablation) | MEAT · DNA-Rendering Part 1, 1024 resolution | P-FID: 10.60 -> 38.37 | Hurt |
| Increase VAE resolution from 256 to 512 (ablation) | VAE · VAE reconstruction, 1024 × 1024 | PSNR: 28.02 -> 30.99 | Helped |
| Increase VAE resolution from 512 to 1024 (ablation) | VAE · VAE reconstruction, 1024 × 1024 | PSNR: 30.99 -> 35.59 | Helped |
| Add Gaussian noise to ground-truth SMPL-X parameters (ablation) | MEAT · DNA-Rendering Part 1, erroneous keypoints | PSNR: 18.91 -> 17.64 | Hurt |
| Use harder motion poses (ablation) | MEAT · DNA-Rendering Part 1, motion hard | LPIPS: 0.061 -> 0.086 | Hurt |
Surprising findings
- Directly raising Stable Zero123 to 1024 resolution without a noise schedule change causes many artifacts, so schedule adjustment was needed.
- Keypoint conditioning substantially improved the numerical metrics of the retrained baselines, though they still trailed MEAT in (P-)FID and LPIPS.
Limitations
- Relies on a monocular-reconstructed clothed mesh (ECON/PIFuHD) as the central geometry, so mesh errors and keypoint errors affect results; perturbed keypoints lower metrics.
- Training data is limited to DNA-Rendering (real captured videos), with keypoint and mesh adaptation pipelines needed; generalization evaluated on the same dataset family.
- PPLC consistency metric is best for Wonder3D, which the authors attribute to duplicated back views with limited perspective variation.
Experimental setup
Datasets: DNA-Rendering THUman2.1
Benchmarks: DNA-Rendering Part 1
Metrics: PSNR SSIM LPIPS FID Patch-FID PPLC
Baselines: Stable Zero123 SyncDreamer Wonder3D SV3D MagicMan Dense multiview attention Epipolar attention
Builds on: Zero-1-to-3 Zero123++ Era3D EpiDiff ECON
Closest papers by meaning
- Era3D: High-Resolution Multiview Diffusion using Efficient Row-wise Attention (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.90)
- Vivid-ZOO: Multi-View Video Generation with Diffusion Model (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.89)
- MVGenMaster: Scaling Multi-View Generation from Any Image via 3D Priors Enhanced Diffusion Model (CVPR 2025 · similarity 0.88)
- MagicMan: Generative Novel View Synthesis of Humans with 3D-Aware Diffusion and Iterative Refinement (AAAI 2025 · similarity 0.88)
- HumanNorm: Learning Normal Diffusion Model for High-quality and Realistic 3D Human Generation (CVPR 2024 · similarity 0.88)
- PSHuman: Photorealistic Single-image 3D Human Reconstruction using Cross-Scale Multiview Diffusion and Explicit Remeshing (CVPR 2025 · similarity 0.88)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
