atlas

Research map / 3D vision / Human pose estimation

Leveraging Global Stereo Consistency for Category-Level Shape and 6D Pose Estimation from Stereo Images

CVPR 2025 · 3D vision › Human pose estimation · approach: Instance-level 6D object pose · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a stereo-based category-level shape and 6D pose/scale estimator that fits a shared intra-category occupancy field to both views via iterative global shape fitting (GSF-Net), and introduces the S-RGBD dataset for comparing stereo and RGBD methods across depth-friendly and depth-challenging materials.

Problem

Category-level shape and 6D pose estimation from stereo images, where missing explicit depth causes pose, scale and shape parameters to become entangled and optimization to fall into local optima; also whether stereo or RGBD methods better handle diverse materials with poor depth.

Approach

Use a shared intra-category occupancy field across left and right views plus a divide-and-conquer global shape fitting network that iteratively renders normalized depth maps and shares rotation, y-translation and lambda (s/z) across views, with independent x-offsets and stereo-disparity depth to resolve scale.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add global stereo consistency with global shape fittingOurs · TOD Bottle3D50: 73.4 -> 84.2Helped
Add global stereo consistency with global shape fittingOurs · TOD Mug3D50: 92.8 -> 95.9Helped
Add the shared intra-category shape representation and global stereo fittingOurs · S-RGBD Knife3Davg: 58.1 -> 67.9Helped
Add the shared intra-category shape representation and global stereo fittingOurs · S-RGBD Spoon3Davg: 54.3 -> 63.5Helped
Use the monocular version instead of stereo (ablation)Ours · S-RGBD3D50: 83.7 -> 30.5Hurt
Remove global fitting (ablation)Ours · S-RGBD3D50: 83.7 -> 32.4Hurt
Add the shape constraint (ablation)Ours · S-RGBD3D50: 78.1 -> 83.7Helped
Add the rotation constraint (ablation)Ours · S-RGBD3D50: 76.5 -> 83.7Helped
Add the y-translation constraint (ablation)Ours · S-RGBD3D50: 77.5 -> 83.7Helped
Add the λ constraint (ablation)Ours · S-RGBD3D50: 71.1 -> 83.7Helped
Use semantic features only, removing geometric features (ablation)Ours · S-RGBD3D50: 83.7 -> 74.6Hurt
Use geometric features only, removing semantic features (ablation)Ours · S-RGBD3D50: 83.7 -> 77.7Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: TOD S-RGBD

Benchmarks: TOD S-RGBD

Metrics: 3D IoU at 25/50/75 3D_avg rotation error 5°/10° translation error 2/5/10 cm grasp success rate

Baselines: SPD SGPA Second KeyPose StereoPose CODERS

Builds on: NOCS ZeroShape CODERS Megapose DINOv2

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy