atlas

Research map / 3D vision / Human pose estimation

SingRef6D: Monocular Novel Object Pose Estimation with a Single RGB Reference

NeurIPS 2025 · 3D vision › Human pose estimation · approach: Instance-level 6D object pose · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes SingRef6D, a pose estimation pipeline that uses only a single RGB reference image, fine-tuning Depth-Anything v2 with a token scaler and depth-aware LoFTR matching.

Problem

Monocular 6D novel object pose estimation with only a single RGB reference image, where depth sensors fail on transparent/reflective surfaces and RGB matching fails in low-light or texture-less scenes.

Approach

A lightweight token scaler fine-tunes a frozen Depth-Anything v2 to predict metric depth on challenging surfaces (with scale, edge, and normal losses), and the predicted depth is fused into LoFTR's latent space for depth-aware matching, followed by PointDSC pose solving.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use SingRef6D instead of Oryon with SingRef6D depth6D pose estimation · REAL275AR: 20.4 -> 28.7Helped
Use SingRef6D instead of RoMA with SingRef6D depth6D pose estimation · Tyo-LAR: 30.9 -> 31.7Helped
Use SingRef6D instead of RoMA with SingRef6D depth6D pose estimation · ClearPoseAR: 17.7 -> 19.4Helped
Use token-scaler depth fine-tuning instead of Depth-Anything v2 (FT)metric depth estimation · ClearPoseδ1.05: 31.23 -> 54.30Helped
Add scale, edge, and normal losses (ablation)SingRef6D depth · REAL275δ1.05: 31.16 -> 44.28Helped
Add the scale loss to edge and normal losses (ablation)SingRef6D depth · REAL275δ1.05: 40.23 -> 44.28Helped
Add the edge loss to scale and normal losses (ablation)SingRef6D depth · REAL275δ1.05: 40.25 -> 44.28Helped
Add the normal loss to scale and edge losses (ablation)SingRef6D depth · REAL275δ1.05: 40.41 -> 44.28Helped
Add the token scaler rather than fine-tuning only the depth head (ablation)Depth-Anything v2 · REAL275δ1.05: 29.87 -> 44.28Helped
Add depth and latent fusion to the matcher (ablation)LoFTR · Tyo-LAR: 27.2 -> 31.7Helped
Add depth without latent fusion (ablation)LoFTR · Tyo-LAR: 27.2 -> 26.6Hurt
Use additive fusion instead of positional encoding for depth features (ablation)LoFTR · Tyo-LAR: 30.8 -> 31.7Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: REAL275 Toyota-Light ClearPose

Benchmarks: REAL275 Toyota-Light ClearPose

Metrics: delta 1.05 delta 1.10 delta 1.25 RMSE log10 Abs.Rel. Sq.Rel. MAE AR VSD

Baselines: Oryon SIFT RoMA UniDepth Depth-Anything v2 ScaleDepth Metric3D SPIDepth

Builds on: Depth-Anything v2 LoFTR PointDSC ControlNet

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy