atlas

Research map / 3D vision / Gaussian splatting

Mip-Splatting: Alias-free 3D Gaussian Splatting

CVPR 2024 · 3D vision › Gaussian splatting · approach: Compact and efficient Gaussian splatting · 524 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Mip-Splatting makes 3D Gaussian Splatting alias-free across sampling rates by adding a 3D smoothing filter bounded by training-view sampling frequency and replacing 2D screen-space dilation with a 2D Mip (box-approximating) filter.

Problem

3D Gaussian Splatting produces dilation, erosion, and aliasing artifacts when rendering at sampling rates (focal length or camera distance) different from those used in training, i.e., poor out-of-distribution generalization across scales.

Approach

Constrain each 3D Gaussian's maximal frequency with a 3D low-pass filter whose size is set from the maximal sampling rate of the training views (Nyquist), and replace the heuristic 2D screen-space dilation with a 2D Gaussian approximating the pixel-area box filter, enabling alias-free rendering at unseen scales without multi-scale training.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add 3D smoothing and replace 2D dilation with a 2D Mip filter3DGS · Blender, single-scale train/multi-scale test; 1/2, 1/4, and 1/8 resolutionPSNR: 30.66 -> 34.00; 21.38 -> 31.85; 17.69 -> 28.67Helped
Add 3D smoothing and replace 2D dilation with a 2D Mip filter3DGS · Mip-NeRF 360, single-scale train/multi-scale test; 2×, 4×, and 8× resolutionPSNR: 23.50 -> 27.39; 20.71 -> 26.47; 19.59 -> 26.22Helped
Add 3D smoothing and replace 2D dilation with a 2D Mip filter3DGS · Blender, multi-scale train/testPSNR (Avg.): 29.77 -> 34.56Helped
Add 3D smoothing and replace 2D dilation with a 2D Mip filter3DGS · Mip-NeRF 360, single-scale train/same-scale testPSNR: 27.21 -> 27.79No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Blender dataset Mip-NeRF 360 dataset

Benchmarks: Blender dataset Mip-NeRF 360 dataset

Metrics: PSNR SSIM LPIPS

Baselines: NeRF Mip-NeRF Plenoxels TensoRF Instant-NGP Tri-MipRF 3DGS 3DGS + EWA Mip-NeRF 360 Zip-NeRF

Builds on: 3D Gaussian Splatting EWA splatting Mip-NeRF Zip-NeRF

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy