atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Cross-modal learning

Looking Similar Sounding Different: Leveraging Counterfactual Cross-Modal Pairs for Audiovisual Representation Learning

CVPR 2024 · Vision-language and multimodal › Cross-modal learning · approach: Self-supervised audio-visual representation learning · 4 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Uses multilingual movie dubs as counterfactual audio pairs (same visuals, different speech) to augment SimCLR-style cross-modal audiovisual contrastive pretraining, improving HEAR and LVU downstream performance.

Problem

Cross-modal contrastive audiovisual representation learning treats scenes that look similar but have different speech as negatives, which may harm learned representations; counterfactual cross-modal pairs are rarely available.

Approach

Use dubbed movie audio tracks (same video, different spoken language, otherwise similar sound) as positive audio views in a cross-modal contrastive objective, combined with hierarchical same-title batch sampling for hard negatives, so the model learns to ignore speech content.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add dub augmentation to A.1 (ablation)A.1 · HEAR sound and scene classification and non-semantic speech tasksaccuracy / mean average precisionHelped
Add dub augmentation to A.1 (ablation)A.1 · LVU tasksaccuracyMixed
Add dub augmentation to A.3 (ablation)A.3 · Speech Commands (Full)accuracy: 49.53 -> 44.86Hurt
Add dub augmentation to A.3 (ablation)A.3 · VoxLingua107 Top10accuracy: 57.65 -> 59.01Hurt
Add dub augmentation to B.3 (ablation)B.3 · LVU tasksaccuracyHelped
Add dub augmentation to B.3 (ablation)B.3 · VoxLingua107 Top10accuracy: 60.20 -> 59.69Hurt
Use all-language pretraining rather than English-only pretraining (ablation)B.1 · VoxLingua107 Top10accuracy: 57.14 -> 60.20Helped
Use all-language pretraining rather than English-only pretraining (ablation)B.1 · Speech Commands (Full)accuracy: 47.66 -> 50.47Helped
Add within-modal objectives (ablation)B.3 with dub augmentation · HEAR tasksaccuracy / mean average precisionMixed
Use MViT-B rather than MViT-S (ablation)B.3, B.4, and B.5 · downstream tasksaccuracy / mean average precisionNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: in-house movie and TV pretraining dataset with multilingual dubs HEAR tasks LVU LVU-M (synthetic multilingual counterpart)

Benchmarks: HEAR LVU GTZAN

Metrics: top-1 accuracy mean average precision

Baselines: HEAR leaderboard best self-supervised GURA Fuse HuBERT CP-JKU PaSST CLAP Object Transformer (LVU) ViS4mer SVT SCALE STCA Movies2Scenes

Builds on: SimCLR MViT Movies2Scenes

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy