atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Cross-modal learning

From Vision to Audio and Beyond: A Unified Model for Audio-Visual Representation and Generation

ICML 2024 · Vision-language and multimodal › Cross-modal learning · approach: Self-supervised audio-visual representation learning · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes VAB, a unified audio-visual encoder-generator that pre-trains a multiway transformer to predict masked audio codec tokens conditioned on frozen CLIP visual features, enabling fast parallel video-to-audio generation and downstream retrieval and classification.

Problem

Audio-visual representation learning and video-to-audio generation have been studied separately, and existing generative audio models are slow (autoregressive) or limited to specialized generation without unified representation capability.

Approach

Perform masked audio token prediction conditioned on visual features entirely in latent spaces (pre-trained neural codec tokens and frozen CLIP frame features) with a multiway transformer using modality-specific experts in lower layers and shared layers above, so the same pre-trained model supports iterative parallel decoding for generation and fine-tuning for retrieval and classification.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
pre-train with masked audio token prediction before classification fine-tuning rather than train from scratch (ablation)VAB-DAC-Test · VGGSoundaccuracy, audio-visual: 54.7 -> 62.4Helped
add modal-specific experts to the first 12 layers (ablation)VAB-DAC-Test · VGGSoundaccuracy, audio-visual: 42.5 -> 62.4Helped
add contrastive fine-tuning after masked-token pre-training (ablation)VAB-DAC-Test · VGGSoundaccuracy, audio-visual: 56.2 -> 62.4Helped
use a 75% mean masking ratio instead of 55% (ablation)VAB-DAC-Test · VGGSound classification and generationaccuracy / FAD: 56.2 -> 57.2; 5.30 -> 6.55Mixed
use a 35% mean masking ratio instead of 55% (ablation)VAB-DAC-Test · VGGSound classification and generationaccuracy / FAD: 56.2 -> 55.2; 5.30 -> 6.04Mixed
replace eva-CLIP visual features with MAE features (ablation)VAB-DAC-Test · VGGSoundaccuracy, audio-visual: 62.4 -> 55.9Hurt
replace eva-CLIP visual features with MAE features (ablation)VAB-DAC-Test · VGGSoundgeneration FAD: 4.18 -> 4.93Hurt
increase masking temperature from 4.5 to 25.5 (ablation)VAB-Encodec · video-to-audio generationFAD: 5.75 -> 2.69Helped
use 16 decoding iterations instead of 8 (ablation)VAB-Encodec · video-to-audio generationFAD: 3.52 -> 3.1Helped
increase decoding iterations from 16 to 36 (ablation)VAB-Encodec · video-to-audio generationFAD: 3.1 -> 3.25Hurt
use classifier-free guidance scale 5 rather than no guidance (ablation)VAB-DAC · video-to-audio generationFAD: 5.93 -> 3.24Helped
use masked-prediction then contrastive training rather than contrastive then masked prediction (ablation)VAB-DAC-Test · VGGSound retrieval and generationFAD / retrieval R@1: 4.14 -> 4.18; 27.7 -> 28.2; 32.5 -> 30.5Mixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: AudioSet VGGSound ESC-50 Speech Commands

Benchmarks: VGGSound AudioSet MSR-VTT ESC-50 Speech Commands

Metrics: FAD KLD MOS R@1 R@5 R@10 accuracy mAP

Baselines: SpecVQGAN IM2WAV Diff-Foley FoleyGen ImageBind LanguageBind CAV-MAE MAViL

Builds on: MaskGIT VampNet Multiway Transformer (BEiT-3) CAV-MAE Encodec

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy