atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / CNN features

Infrared Small Target Detection with Scale and Location Sensitivity

CVPR 2024 · Detection and segmentation › CNN features · approach: Efficient DETR query design · 253 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a Scale and Location Sensitive (SLS) loss and a simple Multi-Scale Head on plain U-Net (MSHNet) for infrared small target detection, achieving SOTA IoU/Pd on IRSTD-1k and NUDT-SIRST.

Problem

Infrared small target detection (IRSTD) models are trained with IoU and Dice losses that are insensitive to target scale and location, limiting detection performance.

Approach

A loss that weights the IoU loss by a scale ratio (min/max of predicted and ground-truth pixel counts, with variance smoothing) plus a polar-coordinate center-point location penalty, applied at every scale of a plain U-Net with a lightweight multi-scale prediction head.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add the scale weight w to the IoU-based scale loss (ablation)MSHNet · IRSTD-1kIoU (%): 64.83 -> 65.82Helped
add the location-sensitive loss LL to LS (ablation)MSHNet · IRSTD-1kIoU (%): 65.82 -> 67.16Helped
replace LL with L2 center-point distance (ablation)MSHNet · IRSTD-1kIoU (%): 67.16 -> 64.89Hurt
replace LL with L1 center-point distance (ablation)MSHNet · IRSTD-1kIoU (%): 67.16 -> 64.75Hurt
increase the number of supervised prediction scales from 1 to 4 (ablation)MSHNet · IRSTD-1kIoU (%): 63.10 -> 67.16Helped
replace IoU loss with SLS lossDNANet · IRSTD-1kIoU (%): 65.71 -> 67.09Helped
replace IoU loss with SLS lossISNet · IRSTD-1kIoU (%): 62.88 -> 64.42Helped
replace IoU loss with SLS loss (ablation)MSHNet · IRSTD-1kIoU (%): 64.83 -> 67.16Helped
replace SLS loss with IoU loss (ablation)MSHNet · IRSTD-1kFa (10−6): 15.03 -> 5.28Helped
replace SLS loss with Dice loss (ablation)MSHNet · IRSTD-1kIoU (%): 67.16 -> 65.36Hurt
use SLS loss instead of IoU or Dice loss (ablation)MSHNet · IRSTD-1kFa (10−6): 5.28; 14.12; 15.03Mixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: IRSTD-1k NUDT-SIRST

Benchmarks: IRSTD-1k NUDT-SIRST

Metrics: IoU Pd Fa FLOPs inference speed

Baselines: Top-Hat Max-Median WSLCM TLLCM IPI NRAM RIPT PSTNN MSLSTIPT MDvsFA ALCNet ISNet

Builds on: U-Net IoU loss Dice loss DNANet ISNet

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy