atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Attention and transformers

IRPruneDet: Efficient Infrared Small Target Detection via Wavelet Structure-Regularized Soft Channel Pruning

AAAI 2024 · Architectures and efficiency › Attention and transformers · approach: Vision transformer pruning · 155 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes IRPruneDet, a soft channel pruning method for infrared small target detection that uses wavelet-domain (Haar) l1 regularization for channel importance and soft channel reconstruction to avoid premature pruning, cutting U-Net18 parameters and FLOPs by about 64% and 51% while improving IoU.

Problem

Infrared small target detection (IRSTD) models are large and computationally expensive, but standard channel pruning criteria (magnitude-based) and hard iterative pruning discard channels carrying faint target information under low SNR.

Approach

Represent conv filters in the wavelet domain and apply l1 regularization on Haar wavelet coefficients (approximated as a gradient/differential operator to avoid extra memory) to score channels, combined with soft channel reconstruction that stochastically re-activates previously pruned channels by interpolating with the best-performing parameters under a cosine schedule.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use WCP instead of l1-norm channel importance pruning (ablation)U-Net pruning on NUAA-SIRST · NUAA-SIRSTIoU: 67.18 -> 74.25Helped
Add SCR to l1-norm pruning (ablation)U-Net pruning on NUAA-SIRST · NUAA-SIRSTIoU: 67.18 -> 73.51Helped
Add SCR to WCP pruning (ablation)U-Net pruning on NUAA-SIRST · NUAA-SIRSTIoU: 74.25 -> 75.12Helped
Replace IRPruneDet pruning with general pruning methods (ablation)U-Net pruning on NUAA-SIRST · NUAA-SIRSTIoU: 75.12 vs 67.18; 70.71; 71.54; 70.82; 71.86Hurt
Use IRPruneDet instead of FC3-NetIRSTD models · NUAA-SIRST and IRSTD-1kIoU: 74.75 -> 75.12; 64.98 -> 64.54Mixed
Use IRPruneDet instead of FC3-NetIRSTD models · NUAA-SIRSTFLOPs (10^9): 10.57 -> 0.9380Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: NUAA-SIRST IRSTD-1k

Benchmarks: NUAA-SIRST IRSTD-1k

Metrics: IoU nIoU Pd Fa FLOPs parameters

Baselines: MDvsFA ACM ALCNet FC3-Net Top-Hat Max-Median WSLCM TLLCM IPI NRAM RIPT PSTNN

Builds on: soft filter pruning (SFP) U-Net ACM Haar wavelet tight frame

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy