atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / CNN features

Pinwheel-shaped Convolution and Scale-based Dynamic Loss for Infrared Small Target Detection

AAAI 2025 · Detection and segmentation › CNN features · approach: Context for hard detection conditions · 199 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes pinwheel-shaped convolution (PConv) to replace early standard convolutions and a scale-based dynamic (SD) loss for BBox and mask labels in infrared small target detection, plus a new SIRST-UAVB dataset.

Problem

Standard convolutions ignore the Gaussian pixel distribution of dim infrared small targets, and existing box/mask losses (CIoU, SLS) do not account for label IoU fluctuation or varying scale sensitivity across target sizes.

Approach

A pinwheel-shaped set of asymmetric-padded 1x3/3x1 and 3x1/1x3 convolutions concatenated and fused by a 2x2 kernel to enlarge the receptive field with few parameters, and a loss that dynamically weights scale and location terms by target area relative to a maximum IRST size (81 pixels).

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace the first two standard convolutions with PConv(4,3) (ablation)YOLOv8n-p2 · IRSTD-1KmAP50: 87.4 -> 89.9Helped
Replace the first two standard convolutions with PConv(4,3) (ablation)YOLOv8n-p2 · SIRST-UAVBmAP50: 93.2 -> 93.8Helped
Use SDB loss (δ=0.3) instead of CIoU (ablation)YOLOv8n-p2 · IRSTD-1KmAP50: 87.4 -> 88.6Helped
Use SDB loss (δ=0.3) instead of CIoU (ablation)YOLOv8n-p2 · SIRST-UAVBmAP50: 93.2 -> 93.9; IoU: 94Mixed
Use SDM loss (δ=0.5) instead of SLS (ablation)MSHNet · IRSTD-1KIoU: 66.82 -> 68.49Helped
Use SDM loss (δ=0.5) instead of SLS (ablation)MSHNet · SIRST-UAVBIoU: 23.93 -> 24.97Helped
Add PConv without changing the baseline loss (ablation)YOLOv8n-p2 · IRSTD-1KmAP50: 87.4 -> 89.9Helped
Add SDB loss without adding PConv (ablation)YOLOv8n-p2 · IRSTD-1KmAP50: 87.4 -> 88.1Helped
Add PConv without changing the baseline loss (ablation)YOLOv8n-p2 · SIRST-UAVBmAP50: 93.2 -> 93.8Helped
Vary SDB loss δ from 0.3 to 0.7 (ablation)YOLOv8n-p2 · IRSTD-1KmAP50: 88.6; 88.1; 88.8Helped
Vary SDB loss δ from 0.3 to 0.7 (ablation)YOLOv8n-p2 · SIRST-UAVBmAP50: 93.9; 93.8; 93.9Mixed
Vary SDM loss δ; δ=0.5 is reported as the best balance (ablation)MSHNet · IRSTD-1KIoU: 68.17; 68.49; 67.19Mixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: IRSTD-1K SIRST-UAVB

Benchmarks: IRSTD-1K SIRST-UAVB

Metrics: precision recall mAP50 IoU Pd Fa

Baselines: Conv GConv DSConv DRConv LSKConv DConv MixConv AKConv CIoU DIoU GIoU IoU

Builds on: SLS loss CIoU YOLOv8 MSHNet

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy