atlas

Research map / 3D vision / Depth and stereo

MVSAnywhere: Zero-Shot Multi-View Stereo

CVPR 2025 · 3D vision › Depth and stereo · approach: Learned stereo with specialized sensors · 11 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces MVSAnywhere, a transformer-based multi-view stereo model that generalizes zero-shot across domains and depth ranges by combining monocular ViT features with an adaptive, view-count- and scale-agnostic cost volume.

Problem

Multi-view stereo depth estimation typically fails to generalize across domains (indoor vs outdoor) and requires known depth ranges and fixed view counts, limiting use as a general-purpose method.

Approach

Combines a cost volume patchifier that tokenizes the multi-view cost volume guided by monocular ViT features, a view-count-agnostic weighted-sum metadata aggregation with scale normalization, and a cascaded cost volume that infers depth range from camera poses at test time.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use ViT-B instead of ViT Small (ablation)MVSA · RMVDB averagerel: 3.40 -> 3.00Helped
use the proposed architecture instead of [59]'s fully-convolutional architecture (ablation)MVSA · RMVDB averagerel: 3.39 -> 3.00Helped
add training-time noise to the ground-truth range (ablation)MVSA · RMVDB averagerel: 5.32 -> 3.00Helped
use pretrained Depth Anything V2 weights (ablation)MVSA · RMVDB averagerel: 3.24 -> 3.00Helped
use adaptive depth bins instead of fixed bins [0-100m] (ablation)MVSA · RMVDB averagerel: 3.37 -> 3.00Helped
use the Mono/Multi Cue Combiner ViT instead of CNN layers (ablation)MVSA · RMVDB averagerel: 3.41 -> 3.00Helped
add test-time cost-volume bin refinement (ablation)MVSA · RMVDB averagerel: 4.26 -> 3.00Helped
use the proposed cost-volume patchifier instead of naive patchification (ablation)MVSA · RMVDB averagerel: 3.11 -> 3.00Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Hypersim TartanAIR BlendedMVG MatrixCity VKITTI2 Dynamic Replica MVSSynth SAIL-VOS 3D

Benchmarks: Robust Multi-View Depth Benchmark (RMVDB) ScanNet Mesh Evaluation ETH3D variant of RMVDB

Metrics: absolute relative error (rel) inlier percentage tau (1.03) chamfer distance F-score precision recall

Baselines: MAST3R Depth Anything V2 Depth Pro Metric3D UniDepth MVSFormer++ Robust MVD Baseline MVS2D Fast-MVSNet SimpleRecon

Builds on: SimpleRecon Depth Anything V2 DINOv2 MAST3R DeepVideoMVS

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy