atlas

Research map / Large language models / AI and society

Towards a Theory of AI Personhood

AAAI 2025 · Large language models › AI and society · approach: Human-centered trust and agency

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

A position/theory paper that proposes three necessary conditions for AI personhood (agency, theory-of-mind, self-awareness), reviews mixed ML evidence on contemporary LMs, and discusses implications for alignment and ethical treatment.

Problem

When, if ever, should AI systems be ascribed personhood, and how does this bear on alignment and the ethical treatment of AI?

Approach

Decomposes AI personhood into agency (intentional-stance-based mental states and robust adaptation), theory-of-mind (higher-order intentional states and communicative language use), and self-awareness (self-knowledge, self-location, introspection, self-reflection), then argues that self-reflection on goals may induce goal change and undermine control-based alignment framings.

Key results

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Builds on: intentional stance Grice's theory of communicative meaning legal personhood

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy