AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Human and embodied modeling

Language-grounded visual concept learning

Learns visual concepts by tokenization, decomposition, and transfer from language models.

83 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2017–2026) · an approach in Human and embodied modeling, keyword cluster “concepts · brain · fmri”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

20 papers in 2023–24 and 39 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 3.8% to 5.8%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 2172018: 5182019: 3192020: 4202021: 4212022: 6222023: 4232024: 16242025: 17252026: 2226

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

60 papers here report 612 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 64%, no clear effect 8%, hurt 25%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add image-level alignment (ILA)Derm7pt; PH²; SkinCon · AUC_D (%)82.9 -> 84.1; 96.1 -> 97.7; 75.0 -> 75.9HelpedMICA: Towards Explainable Skin Lesion Diagnosis via Multi-Level Image-Concept Alignment (AAAI 2024 · 27 citations)
Add Learnable InstructionORES · M-Evasion Ratio28.8% -> 85.6%HelpedORES: Open-Vocabulary Responsible Visual Synthesis (AAAI 2024 · 5 citations)
Use Semi-NMF rather than random-word groundingCOCO Dog · CLIPScore top-10.519 ± 0.05 -> 0.610 ± 0.09HelpedA Concept-Based Explainability Framework for Large Multimodal Models (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
Add Gaussian alignmentBroden, ResNet-18 · concept accuracy (%)67.23 -> 74.89HelpedLG-CAV: Train Any Concept Activation Vector with Language Guidance (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
use automatic concept descriptions rather than MILAN annotations, without contextual filteringImageNet Validation · Total explanation score (GPT-4o)3.14 -> 3.25HelpedCoE: Chain-of-Explanation via Automatic Visual Concept Circuit Description and Polysemanticity Quantification (CVPR 2025 · 1 citation)
increase LoRA rank from 1 to 2ConCon-Chi single-concept context queries · mRR51.64 -> 52.31MixedImproving Personalized Search with Regularized Low-Rank Parameter Updates (CVPR 2025 · 0 citations)
Add context-aware attention to the GCD setupStanford Action · novel accuracy67.8 -> 73.3HelpedOpen Ad-hoc Categorization with Contextualized Feature Learning (CVPR 2025 · 0 citations)
Use reverse weighting rather than uniform weightingImageNet-1k training · L0.748 (±.006) -> .829 (±.008)HelpedInterpreting CLIP with Hierarchical Sparse Autoencoders (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
use RL search rather than 0.25 GreedySearch strategy ablation · Entropy2.40 -> 2.80HelpedExplainable Concept Generation through Vision-Language Preference Learning for Understanding Neural Networks' Internal Representations (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
add contrastive visual features instead of using non-contrastive visual featuresNovelSpecies, Fixed Real Data 5:1 · accuracy71.8 -> 73.0HelpedContrastive Visual Data Augmentation (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
use Qwen2.5-VL instead of InternVL2-5 for concept-axis discoveryCelebA-HQ visual concept editing · CLIP23.88 -> 23.72HurtBridging the gap to real-world language-grounded visual concept learning (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Add the text anchor lossVisual concept editing, category edit · CLIP-Score0.268 -> 0.308HelpedLanguage-Informed Visual Concept Learning (ICLR 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 27 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • ImageNet · 3 of 27 papers
  • ImageNet-1K · 3 of 27 papers
  • CelebA · 3 of 27 papers
  • DTD · 2 of 27 papers

Baselines

  • CKA · 2 of 27 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 59 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 37 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy