atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Human and embodied modeling

Open Ad-hoc Categorization with Contextualized Feature Learning

CVPR 2025 · Vision-language and multimodal › Human and embodied modeling · approach: Language-grounded visual concept learning · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes OAK, a method that adds a single learnable context token to a frozen CLIP ViT and trains it with GCD clustering plus text-guided pseudo-label regularization, for open ad-hoc categorization across contexts.

Problem

Open ad-hoc categorization: given a context, a few labeled exemplars and unlabeled images, infer novel categories that depend on the context and categorize all images, which common-category methods (CLIP zero-shot, GCD) handle poorly.

Approach

Introduce a per-context learnable token into a frozen CLIP ViT to make attention and features context-aware, trained with GCD's contrastive clustering loss plus a text-guided cross-entropy loss over known and LLM-proposed novel class names using pseudo-labels from SS-KMeans.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add context-aware attention to the GCD setup (ablation)OAK · Stanford Actionnovel accuracy: 67.8 -> 73.3Helped
Add context-aware attention to the GCD setup (ablation)OAK · Stanford Actionknown accuracy: 89.4 -> 83.1Hurt
Add text-guided regularization to the GCD setup (ablation)OAK · Stanford Actionknown accuracy: 89.4 -> 95.7Helped
Add text-guided regularization to the GCD setup (ablation)OAK · Stanford Actionnovel accuracy: 67.8 -> 63.2Hurt
Add context-aware attention and text-guided regularization (ablation)OAK · Stanford Omnioverall accuracy: 52.3 -> 70.3Helped
Use OAK instead of GCDStanford · Stanford Moodnovel accuracy: 40.6 -> 87.4Helped
Use OAK instead of GCDClevr-4 · Clevr-4 Omnioverall accuracy: 22.6 -> 28.5Helped
Use OAK instead of µGCDClevr-4 full-shot · Clevr-4 Texturenovel accuracy: 55.5 -> 66.5Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Stanford (Action, Location, Mood) Clevr-4 (Texture, Color, Shape, Count)

Benchmarks: Stanford Clevr-4

Metrics: known accuracy novel accuracy overall accuracy Omni accuracy

Baselines: CLIP-ZS CLIP-ZS + LLM vocab CLIP-ZS + GT vocab SS-KMeans GCD SimGCD µGCD

Builds on: CLIP generalized category discovery (GCD) visual prompt tuning SimGCD GPC

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy