AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Combinatorial and search optimization

Constrained neural network optimization

Embeds linear or orthogonal constraints into network layers and analyzes constrained training and routing.

111 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Combinatorial and search optimization, keyword cluster “objective · multi · solutions”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

29 papers in 2023–24 and 24 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 8.4% to 6.6%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 2162017: 5172018: 9182019: 10192020: 14202021: 8212022: 10222023: 12232024: 17242025: 10252026: 1426

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

87 papers here report 762 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 68%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 18%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
increase ELM-PI hidden units to m=3200 or m=6400Synthetic n=4 nonlinear control · maximum testing error10^{-3}; 10^{-5}HelpedPhysics-Informed Neural Network Policy Iteration: Algorithms, Convergence, and Verification (ICML 2024 · 10 citations)
Add tanh pre-activation before each forward FFTMixed-precision FNO training · numerical stabilityHelpedGuaranteed Approximation Bounds for Mixed-Precision Neural Operators (ICLR 2024 · 4 citations)
Use the diagonal Jacobian approximation rather than the exact JacobianGeneral nonlinear RNN evaluation · Newton iterations to convergenceapproximately 2 times more Newton iterationsHurtTowards Scalable and Stable Parallelization of Nonlinear RNNs (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
remove all discrete bottlenecksSALSA-CLRS BFS, size 1600 · graph-level accuracy100. -> 0.0HurtDiscrete Neural Algorithmic Reasoning (ICML 2025 · 1 citation)
add task-network pre-training on the safe network outputPortfolio optimization · Optimality Gap3.14(6.36) -> 2.35(6.37)HelpedEnforcing Hard Linear Constraints in Deep Learning Models with Decision Rules (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
use ASMCVaR with m=15 instead of m=10FF25EU · final cumulative wealth122.82 -> 123.13HelpedAutonomous Sparse Mean-CVaR Portfolio Optimization (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
Using CP formulation instead of MILP (Gurobi) for no-bagging reconstructionCOMPAS, no bagging, max depth None · average reconstruction time (s)49.7 s (CP) vs 188.3 s (MILP)HelpedTrained Random Forests Completely Reveal your Dataset (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
Extend testing DVN depth from 40 to 300B2500(10) · GAP (%)0.362 -> 0.034HelpedLearning to Solve Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization in a Classification Way (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Increase the sparsity cap from m=10 to m=15FF25, T=60 · Sharpe ratio0.2481 -> 0.2481No clear effectA Globally Optimal Portfolio for m-Sparse Sharpe Ratio Maximization (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Add orthogonal scratchpad transformationsTSP · mean tour lengthHelpedRethinking Deep Thinking: Stable Learning of Algorithms using Lipschitz Constraints (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Set event loss weight $\lambda_2$ to 0.005 rather than the Neural ETC-PI reference 0.05Lorenz · Triggering times{29} -> 114HurtNeural Event-Triggered Control with Optimal Scheduling (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase parametrization richnessCOMPAS · maximum constraint violationHelpedNear-Optimal Solutions of Constrained Learning Problems (ICLR 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 14 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Baselines

  • OSQP · 2 of 14 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 53 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy