AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Large language models / Reasoning and chain of thought

Test-time compute scaling

Allocate inference-time compute through confidence, branching, and self-consistency strategies.

205 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2021–2026) · an approach in Reasoning and chain of thought, keyword cluster “test time · scaling · rl”

State History Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

4 papers in 2023–24 and 200 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 3.1% to 14.1%.

Open questions the data points to

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 0192020: 0202021: 1212022: 0222023: 1232024: 3242025: 43252026: 15726

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

46 papers here report 536 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 71%, no clear effect 7%, hurt 18%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Hardness-guided reward (memorized layer) vs vanilla rewardablation under varied alpha (GLUE) · accuracy vs speedup trade-offHelpedConsistentEE: A Consistent and Hardness-Guided Early Exiting Method for Accelerating Language Models Inference (AAAI 2024 · 9 citations)
Lower sampling temperature from 0.7 to 0.5GSM8K · gapHurtMind the Gap: Examining the Self-Improvement Capabilities of Large Language Models (ICLR 2025 · 5 citations)
Use three principal components to represent benchmark capabilitiesCollected base-model benchmarks · explained varianceHelpedObservational Scaling Laws and the Predictability of Langauge Model Performance (NeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations)
Add KL regularization to EM-FT with N=1Math average · score40.2 -> 39.6HurtThe Unreasonable Effectiveness of Entropy Minimization in LLM Reasoning (NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations)
Add pause tokens during finetuning only, without pause-pretrainingGSM8k · accuracy7.5 ± 0.5 -> 6.9 ± 1.0HurtThink before you speak: Training Language Models With Pause Tokens (ICLR 2024 · 2 citations)
Use stepwise rather than full-trajectory preference dataStrongReject · goodness score0.6663 -> 0.6955HelpedSTAIR: Improving Safety Alignment with Introspective Reasoning (ICML 2025 · 1 citation)
Remove Insight 1 and use random initialization2WikiMultiHopQA · Finding optimal configurationsHurtAgentTTS: Large Language Model Agent for Test-time Compute-optimal Scaling Strategy in Complex Tasks (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
Add Reasoning Pruning to Perplexity ConsistencyMathOdyssey · # samplings to reach self-consistency performance112 -> 32HelpedA Theoretical Study on Bridging Internal Probability and Self-Consistency for LLM Reasoning (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
Add zero-shot chain-of-thought prompting for pairwise comparisonsGPQA and other evaluated settings · accuracyHelpedProvable Scaling Laws for the Test-Time Compute of Large Language Models (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
increase alpha_base from 0.1 to 1.0Macro Average · Pass@148.0 -> 39.2HurtThe Overthinker's DIET: Cutting Token Calories with DIfficulty-AwarE Training (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
Use lower sampling temperatureAPPS · Pass@tokenHelpedDISC: Dynamic Decomposition Improves LLM Inference Scaling (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)
Vary the prior hyperparametersLiveCodeBench · Pass@138.4 ± 1.6; 37.3 ± 0.4; 36.8 ± 1.5; 37.5 ± 1.5; 37.7 ± 1.3No clear effectWider or Deeper? Scaling LLM Inference-Time Compute with Adaptive Branching Tree Search (NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
CoTGSM8kaccuracy42.9 – 88.12 papers, e.g. NeurIPS 2025 and ICML 2025

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 200 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • GSM8K · 39 of 200 papers
  • MATH-500 · 26 of 200 papers
  • MATH · 25 of 200 papers
  • MBPP · 17 of 200 papers
  • AIME 2024 · 13 of 200 papers
  • HumanEval · 12 of 200 papers
  • LiveCodeBench · 9 of 200 papers
  • AIME24 · 9 of 200 papers

Baselines

  • Best-of-N · 17 of 200 papers
  • GPT-4o · 14 of 200 papers
  • GRPO · 14 of 200 papers
  • Self-Consistency · 13 of 200 papers
  • SFT · 10 of 200 papers
  • Majority Voting · 8 of 200 papers
  • Beam Search · 7 of 200 papers
  • DeepSeek-R1 · 6 of 200 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 204 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 22 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy