AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Large language models / Alignment and preferences

Reward model design and preference models

Combine, actively label, and generalize reward and preference models beyond Bradley-Terry.

88 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2017–2026) · an approach in Alignment and preferences, keyword cluster “feedback · human · rlhf”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

15 papers in 2023–24 and 70 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 11.5% to 13.4%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 1172018: 1182019: 1192020: 0202021: 0212022: 0222023: 1232024: 14242025: 31252026: 3926

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

45 papers here report 478 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 63%, no clear effect 7%, hurt 26%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add iterative evolutionary reward search rather than spending the same sample budget on initial samplesIsaac and Dexterity · task performanceHelpedEureka: Human-Level Reward Design via Coding Large Language Models (ICLR 2024 · 48 citations)
Initialize Scaled BT with Helpfulness-Only Regression and apply ExPORewardBench · overall accuracy93.7 -> 94.1HelpedHelpSteer2-Preference: Complementing Ratings with Preferences (ICLR 2025 · 4 citations)
Replace Daring Anteater with Open Assistant for SFTMT Bench · GPT-4-Turbo score7.96 -> 6.75HurtHelpSteer 2: Open-source dataset for training top-performing reward models (NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations)
Add training on negated relation comparisonsSummarize from Feedback · s_neg60.8 -> 87.9HelpedAligning with Logic: Measuring, Evaluating and Improving Logical Preference Consistency in Large Language Models (ICML 2025 · 3 citations)
add entity-facet embeddings XeREDIAL · Distinct-20.118 -> 0.126HelpedFacetCRS: Multi-Faceted Preference Learning for Pricking Filter Bubbles in Conversational Recommender System (AAAI 2024 · 3 citations)
Increase batch sizeAlpacaEval (Llama3-70B-Instruct judge) · scoreHelpedDistributional Preference Alignment of LLMs via Optimal Transport (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
Use all subsets instead of General + STEM + CodeRM-Bench · accuracy79.9 -> 78.5HurtHelpSteer3-Preference: Open Human-Annotated Preference Data across Diverse Tasks and Languages (NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations)
Add observation lossTARA single-tool · accuracy (Avg.)90.23 -> 94.23HelpedTool-Augmented Reward Modeling (ICLR 2024 · 2 citations)
apply the learned preference flow iteratively for two iterationsMNIST conditional image generation · preference score0.9841 -> 0.9996HelpedPreference Alignment with Flow Matching (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Remove safety-direction SMV projection from LEGENDSafe-RLHF · accuracy gain over Origin-1.04 (± 2.42)HurtLEGEND: Leveraging Representation Engineering to Annotate Safety Margin for Preference Datasets (AAAI 2025 · 1 citation)
Replace preference weight sampling with distribution weight samplingOpenStreetMap Routing and HomeGrid · overall performanceHurtMAPLE: A Framework for Active Preference Learning Guided by Large Language Models (AAAI 2025 · 1 citation)
remove the two-stage/CNF-based synthesis and auxiliary-concept handling, using one-step synthesisCONTINGENCY full dataset · mIOU (%)76.11 -> 60.74HurtSYNAPSE: SYmbolic Neural-Aided Preference Synthesis Engine (AAAI 2025 · 1 citation)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 37 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • UltraFeedback · 5 of 37 papers
  • RewardBench · 3 of 37 papers
  • HelpSteer2 · 3 of 37 papers
  • HH-RLHF · 3 of 37 papers
  • Safe-RLHF · 2 of 37 papers
  • Alpaca · 2 of 37 papers
  • SummEval · 2 of 37 papers
  • TriviaQA · 2 of 37 papers

Baselines

  • Skywork-Reward-Gemma-2-27B · 5 of 37 papers
  • DPO · 3 of 37 papers
  • Llama-3.1-Nemotron-70B-Reward · 3 of 37 papers
  • IPO · 2 of 37 papers
  • SimPO · 2 of 37 papers
  • GPT-4o · 2 of 37 papers
  • BERTScore · 2 of 37 papers
  • Skywork-Reward-Llama-3.1-8B · 2 of 37 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 85 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 23 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy