AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Image generation / Super-resolution

Blind super-resolution

Estimate or represent unknown degradation kernels for blind super-resolution.

24 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2019–2026) · an approach in Super-resolution, keyword cluster “lr · hr · degradation”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Export

Where it stands

Still moving The best reported result is still improving on 1 of 1 tracked benchmark.

6 papers in 2023–24 and 3 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 5.1% to 1.8%.

Open questions the data points to

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 3192020: 3202021: 6212022: 3222023: 3232024: 3242025: 2252026: 126

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

DIV2KRK ×2 · PSNR (higher is better)

4 papers, 2020–2025 · still improving

2020: 32.562022: 32.752025: 33.31
20202025

What has been tried

22 papers here report 213 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 72%, no clear effect 5%, hurt 21%, mixed 2%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Remove the RKS moduleGaussian kernels, Set14 x4 · image PSNR25.98 -> 18.77HurtA Dynamic Kernel Prior Model for Unsupervised Blind Image Super-Resolution (CVPR 2024 · 37 citations)
Add degradation prior to the no-prior modelSet5, ×4, kernel width 1.2 · PSNR32.074 -> 32.372HelpedCDFormer: When Degradation Prediction Embraces Diffusion Model for Blind Image Super-Resolution (CVPR 2024 · 25 citations)
Add degradation learning (DL) to the baselineRGB-D-D · RMSEHelpedDORNet: A Degradation Oriented and Regularized Network for Blind Depth Super-Resolution (CVPR 2025 · 9 citations)
Add GDA blocksDIV2KRK, ×2 · PSNR32.69 -> 33.31HelpedUnsupervised Degradation Representation Aware Transform for Real-World Blind Image Super-Resolution (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 5 papers of this approach from 2024–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • DIV2K · 3 of 5 papers
  • Set5 · 3 of 5 papers
  • Set14 · 3 of 5 papers
  • BSD100 · 3 of 5 papers
  • Urban100 · 3 of 5 papers
  • Flickr2K · 2 of 5 papers
  • Manga109 · 2 of 5 papers

Baselines

  • DCLS · 3 of 5 papers
  • DASR · 3 of 5 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 22 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy