AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / Open-set and few-shot detection

Zero-shot segmentation and detection

Recognize unseen classes via generative features and semantic alignment.

49 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Open-set and few-shot detection, keyword cluster “zero · shot object · shot segmentation”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

24 papers in 2023–24 and 8 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 4.1% to 1.4%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 1172018: 0182019: 4192020: 6202021: 3212022: 2222023: 9232024: 15242025: 3252026: 526

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

44 papers here report 489 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 77%, no clear effect 3%, hurt 16%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
use DINOv2 instead of VGG/CLIP as ID extractor backboneDreamBooth benchmark · DINO ScoreDINO 27.7 (VGG) / 31.5 (CLIP G+P) -> 64.1 (DINOv2 G+P)HelpedAnyDoor: Zero-shot Object-level Image Customization (CVPR 2024 · 175 citations)
Aggregate attention maps proportionally across resolutions rather than using only 64×64 mapssegmentation examples · segmentation qualityHelpedDiffuse Attend and Segment: Unsupervised Zero-Shot Segmentation using Stable Diffusion (CVPR 2024 · 79 citations)
add depth prediction supervision to the two-stream modelDAVIS-16, FBMS, and Long-Videos · J75.9 -> 77.0; 75.1 -> 77.5; 63.9 -> 62.8MixedDepth-aware Test-Time Training for Zero-shot Video Object Segmentation (CVPR 2024 · 41 citations)
use object-agnostic rather than object-aware text promptsZSAD image- and pixel-level datasets · AUROCHelpedAnomalyCLIP: Object-agnostic Prompt Learning for Zero-shot Anomaly Detection (ICLR 2024 · 32 citations)
add re-perceptionMP3D · SR36.5 -> 40.1HelpedSG-Nav: Online 3D Scene Graph Prompting for LLM-based Zero-shot Object Navigation (NeurIPS 2024 · 30 citations)
add the region-level bridgePASCAL VOC 2012 · hIoU84.3 -> 85.4HelpedExploring Regional Clues in CLIP for Zero-Shot Semantic Segmentation (CVPR 2024 · 25 citations)
Add primitive-wise attribute and object learning to composition-wise learningMIT-States CW · AUC19.1 -> 21.1HelpedContext-based and Diversity-driven Specificity in Compositional Zero-Shot Learning (CVPR 2024 · 21 citations)
add object-aware feature groupingReal-world colon tumor · DSC31.28 -> 36.23HelpedZePT: Zero-Shot Pan-Tumor Segmentation via Query-Disentangling and Self-Prompting (CVPR 2024 · 20 citations)
make matching bidirectional rather than one-way from t to t+1LEVIR-CD · mask AR@10001.3 -> 32.6HelpedSegment Any Change (NeurIPS 2024 · 19 citations)
add SPTPASCAL VOC 2012 · mIoU(U)77.8 -> 86.7HelpedSpectral Prompt Tuning: Unveiling Unseen Classes for Zero-Shot Semantic Segmentation (AAAI 2024 · 16 citations)
Add class-agnostic trainingCOCO-stuff · mIoU45.99 -> 49.17HelpedCSL: Class-Agnostic Structure-Constrained Learning for Segmentation Including the Unseen (AAAI 2024 · 12 citations)
add the separation-to-fusion structureCOCOA-cls · mean IoU (%)78.08 -> 80.54HelpedTowards Efficient Foundation Model for Zero-shot Amodal Segmentation (CVPR 2025 · 6 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 18 papers of this approach from 2024–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • PASCAL VOC 2012 · 3 of 18 papers
  • Cityscapes · 2 of 18 papers
  • COCO-Stuff 164K · 2 of 18 papers
  • YouTubeVOS · 2 of 18 papers
  • MIT-States · 2 of 18 papers
  • C-GQA · 2 of 18 papers
  • HM3D · 2 of 18 papers

Baselines

  • ZegFormer · 4 of 18 papers
  • ZSSeg · 4 of 18 papers
  • ZegCLIP · 3 of 18 papers
  • CLIP · 3 of 18 papers
  • SML · 2 of 18 papers
  • SPNet · 2 of 18 papers
  • ZS3 · 2 of 18 papers
  • CaGNet · 2 of 18 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 32 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 36 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy