AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Detection and segmentation / CNN features

RGB salient object detection

Detect salient objects with attention, edge cues, and recurrent refinement.

61 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in CNN features, keyword cluster “salient · saliency · sod”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Preprints Export

Where it stands

Few recent reports The tracked benchmarks have at most one report from 2025–26 that could beat the old record, too few to say whether they are still moving.

2 papers in 2023–24 and 2 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 0.6% to 0.6%.

Open questions the data points to

No longer reported by papers here: DUT-OMRON (MAE, last in 2020).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 7162017: 6172018: 12182019: 13192020: 10202021: 3212022: 6222023: 2232024: 0242025: 1252026: 126

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

ECSSD · MAE (lower is better)

19 papers, 2016–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2016: 0.062017: 0.0542018: 0.0442019: 0.0328
20162025

HKU-IS · MAE (lower is better)

18 papers, 2016–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2016: 0.0492017: 0.0392018: 0.0372019: 0.032020: 0.027
20162025

PASCAL-S · MAE (lower is better)

17 papers, 2016–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2016: 0.12017: 0.0812018: 0.0742019: 0.0642020: 0.06
20162025

DUT-OMRON · MAE (lower is better)

15 papers, 2016–2020 · not reported since 2020

2016: 0.072017: 0.0692018: 0.062019: 0.0414
20162020

DUTS-TE · MAE (lower is better)

8 papers, 2019–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2019: 0.042020: 0.034
20192025

HKU-IS · maxF (higher is better)

8 papers, 2016–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2016: 0.9042017: 0.9162018: 0.922019: 0.9282020: 0.939
20162025
YearBest so farSet by
20160.904Deep Contrast Learning for Salient Object Detection (CVPR 2016 · 739 citations)
20170.916Instance-Level Salient Object Segmentation (CVPR 2017 · 303 citations)
20180.92A Bi-Directional Message Passing Model for Salient Object Detection (CVPR 2018 · 512 citations)
20190.928BASNet: Boundary-Aware Salient Object Detection (CVPR 2019 · 1,605 citations)
20200.939Progressive Feature Polishing Network for Salient Object Detection (AAAI 2020 · 107 citations)

What has been tried

59 papers here report 601 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 79%, no clear effect 5%, hurt 14%, mixed 2%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Use DMM instead of the plain ANN decoderDUT-O · maxF0.647 -> 0.725HelpedExploring Salient Object Detection with Adder Neural Networks (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
DCL+SODMAE0.126 – 0.1532 papers, e.g. CVPR 2017 and CVPR 2017

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 22 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy