AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Bandits and online learning / Multi-armed bandits

Bandit formulations for ML problems

Cast LLM decoding, sampling, and experimental design as bandit problems.

42 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Multi-armed bandits, keyword cluster “multi armed · armed bandit · stochastic”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

10 papers in 2023–24 and 9 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 9.4% to 7.2%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 2162017: 4172018: 1182019: 6192020: 2202021: 5212022: 3222023: 7232024: 3242025: 6252026: 326

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

38 papers here report 320 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 69%, no clear effect 7%, hurt 18%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Use E-TS instead of random corruptionFashionMNIST, varying number of corrupted clients · ASRHelpedConstructing Adversarial Examples for Vertical Federated Learning: Optimal Client Corruption through Multi-Armed Bandit (ICLR 2024 · 1 citation)
Use the empirical mean for arrival probabilities instead of a UCBLLM cache · suboptimality gap bounda factor of sqrt{m}HelpedOffline Learning for Combinatorial Multi-armed Bandits (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Use gradient-based features instead of DINO embeddings for submodular selectionFashion-MNIST across subset sizes · test accuracyHelpedBandit Guided Submodular Curriculum for Adaptive Subset Selection (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase MDN's initial labeled pool sizeVOC2012 · minimum and mean mAP@501,200 initially labeled samples (40% of budget)HelpedAdaptive Data Collection for Robust Learning Across Multiple Distributions (ICML 2025)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 6 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR10 · 2 of 6 papers
  • MNIST · 2 of 6 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 19 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 32 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy