atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Graph self-supervised learning

Modeling Inter-Intra Heterogeneity for Graph Federated Learning

AAAI 2025 · Graph learning › Graph self-supervised learning · approach: Heterophily and imbalance on graphs · 5 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes FedIIH, a graph federated learning method that infers subgraph data distributions with a hierarchical variational graph autoencoder for inter-subgraph similarity and disentangles each subgraph into latent factors with per-factor separate federation for intra-heterogeneity.

Problem

Personalized graph federated learning suffers from unreliable inter-subgraph similarity estimated from local model outputs and ignores heterogeneity within each subgraph (intra-heterogeneity).

Approach

A hierarchical variational graph autoencoder (HVGAE) links local latent factors to shared global latent factors so that JS divergence between inferred subgraph distributions gives per-factor client similarities; a DisenGCN disentangles each subgraph into K factors and parameters are federated separately per factor.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use FedIIH instead of FED-PUBGraph federated node classification on homophilic datasets · Non-overlapping, all datasetsaverage accuracy: 83.10 vs 81.59; 1.51% higherHelped
Use FedIIH instead of FED-PUBGraph federated node classification on homophilic datasets · Overlapping, all datasetsaverage accuracy: 81.01 vs 79.53; 1.48% higherHelped
Use FedIIH instead of FedSage+Graph federated node classification on heterophilic datasets · Non-overlapping, all datasetsaverage score: 64.52 vs 58.73; 5.79%Helped
Use FedIIH instead of FedSage+Graph federated node classification on heterophilic datasets · Overlapping, all datasetsaverage score: 62.50 vs 57.97; 4.53%Helped
Add the hierarchical model (ablation)FedIIH · Cora and Amazon-ratings, non-overlapping and overlappingaccuracy: Cora: ↓3.18, ↓1.99; Amazon-ratings: ↓2.55, ↓4.59 when removedHelped
Add variational inference (ablation)FedIIH · Cora and Amazon-ratings, non-overlapping and overlappingaccuracy: Cora: ↓8.34, ↓2.17; Amazon-ratings: ↓2.56, ↓1.93 when removedHelped
Add disentanglement (ablation)FedIIH · Cora and Amazon-ratings, non-overlapping and overlappingaccuracy: Cora: ↓3.07, ↓3.39; Amazon-ratings: ↓3.04, ↓2.65 when removedHelped
Increase the number of latent factors K (ablation)FedIIH · TolokersperformanceHelped
Use K=1 instead of multiple latent factors (ablation)FedIIH · Most datasetsperformanceHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Cora CiteSeer PubMed Amazon-Computer Amazon-Photo ogbn-arxiv Roman-empire Amazon-ratings Minesweeper Tolokers Questions

Benchmarks: Cora CiteSeer PubMed Amazon-Computer Amazon-Photo ogbn-arxiv Roman-empire Amazon-ratings Minesweeper Tolokers Questions

Metrics: accuracy AUC

Baselines: Local FedAvg FedProx FedPer GCFL FedGNN FedSage+ FED-PUB FedGTA AdaFGL

Builds on: FED-PUB DisenGCN VGAE FedHB

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy