Research map / Graph learning / Graph self-supervised learning
Less is More: Federated Graph Learning with Alleviating Topology Heterogeneity from A Causal Perspective
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Proposes FedATH, a federated graph learning method that uses a learned edge evaluator to split each client's graph into causal and biased subgraphs, trains dual GNNs with CE, negative-entropy and HSIC losses, and shares only the causal GNN.
Problem
Federated graph learning suffers from topology heterogeneity: nodes of the same class connect to different classes across clients, causing biased local GNN training; existing fixes add global signals at high computation and communication cost.
Approach
Instead of adding global information, reduce superfluous topology: a private edge evaluator splits local edges into causal and biased subgraphs, a dual-GNN encodes each, cross-entropy and negative-entropy losses plus HSIC enforce separation, and only the causal GNN is aggregated.
Key results
- On Cora with 10 clients, FedATH reaches 77.90% ACC versus 74.47% for the best baseline FGSSL.
- On Roman-empire with 10 clients, FedATH reaches 48.18% ACC versus 41.59% for FedSage+.
- On ogbn-arxiv with 10 clients, FedATH reaches 42.21% ACC versus 41.02% for FedSage+.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use FedATH instead of the strongest compared baseline | Federated graph learning · Cora, PubMed, ogbn-arxiv, Photo, WikiCS, Roman-empire (K=10, 15, 20) | ACC: 77.90 vs 75.35; 73.42 vs 72.43; 67.97 vs 66.44; 84.06 vs 82.72; 83.61 vs 82.03; 83.03 vs 81.19; 42.21 vs 41.02; 38.46 vs | Helped |
| Add the negative entropy loss LENT (ablation) | FedATH · Cora, PubMed, Photo, WikiCS | ACC: 73.59 -> 75.09; 69.52 -> 72.12; 62.44 -> 63.01; 82.42 -> 83.95; 81.51 -> 83.36; 80.80 -> 82.42; 87.19 -> 89.81; 86.04 -> | Helped |
| Add the HSIC dependence loss LDEP (ablation) | FedATH · Cora, PubMed, Photo, WikiCS | ACC: 73.59 -> 76.40; 69.52 -> 72.92; 62.44 -> 66.29; 82.42 -> 83.78; 81.51 -> 83.29; 80.80 -> 82.44; 87.19 -> 89.24; 86.04 -> | Helped |
| Share the edge evaluator with other clients (CG+EE) instead of sharing only the causal GNN (ablation) | FedATH · Cora, PubMed, Photo, WikiCS | ACC: 77.90 -> 78.69; 73.42 -> 73.34; 67.97 -> 67.02; 84.06 -> 83.23; 83.61 -> 83.01; 83.03 -> 81.77; 90.33 -> 86.96; 88.61 -> | Hurt |
| Share the biased GNN with other clients (CG+BG) instead of sharing only the causal GNN (ablation) | FedATH · Cora, PubMed, Photo, WikiCS | ACC: 77.90 -> 76.59; 73.42 -> 73.17; 67.97 -> 66.45; 84.06 -> 83.16; 83.61 -> 82.94; 83.03 -> 82.53; 90.33 -> 86.87; 88.61 -> | Hurt |
Surprising findings
- Several conventional FL methods (e.g., FedProx, MOON) perform no better than or worse than FedAvg in many settings, indicating they do not handle topology heterogeneity.
- Sharing the edge evaluator or biased GNN in addition to the causal GNN degrades performance.
Limitations
- Requires node labels for training, so it is restricted to supervised settings as the authors note.
- The lambda trade-off parameter must be tuned per dataset (larger on Cora, smaller on WikiCS).
- Theoretical analysis is a generalization bound whose link to the method is only qualitative.
Experimental setup
Datasets: Cora PubMed ogbn-arxiv Photo WikiCS Roman-empire
Benchmarks: Cora PubMed ogbn-arxiv Photo WikiCS Roman-empire
Metrics: ACC F1
Baselines: FedAvg FedProx MOON FedOPT FedProto FedSage+ FGSSL FedPUB FedTAD
Builds on: FedAvg FedTAD FGSSL FedPUB
Closest papers by meaning
- FedSPA: Generalizable Federated Graph Learning under Homophily Heterogeneity (CVPR 2025 · similarity 0.92)
- $S^2$FGL: Spatial Spectral Federated Graph Learning (ICML 2025 · similarity 0.91)
- FedSSP: Federated Graph Learning with Spectral Knowledge and Personalized Preference (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.90)
- GHOST: Generalizable One-Shot Federated Graph Learning with Proxy-Based Topology Knowledge Retention (ICML 2025 · similarity 0.90)
- Virtual Nodes Can Help: Tackling Distribution Shifts in Federated Graph Learning (AAAI 2025 · similarity 0.90)
- FedGOG: Federated Graph Out-of-Distribution Generalization with Diffusion Data Exploration and Latent Embedding Decorrelation (AAAI 2025 · similarity 0.89)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
