atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Graph self-supervised learning

Less is More: Federated Graph Learning with Alleviating Topology Heterogeneity from A Causal Perspective

ICML 2025 · Graph learning › Graph self-supervised learning · approach: Heterophily and imbalance on graphs

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes FedATH, a federated graph learning method that uses a learned edge evaluator to split each client's graph into causal and biased subgraphs, trains dual GNNs with CE, negative-entropy and HSIC losses, and shares only the causal GNN.

Problem

Federated graph learning suffers from topology heterogeneity: nodes of the same class connect to different classes across clients, causing biased local GNN training; existing fixes add global signals at high computation and communication cost.

Approach

Instead of adding global information, reduce superfluous topology: a private edge evaluator splits local edges into causal and biased subgraphs, a dual-GNN encodes each, cross-entropy and negative-entropy losses plus HSIC enforce separation, and only the causal GNN is aggregated.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use FedATH instead of the strongest compared baselineFederated graph learning · Cora, PubMed, ogbn-arxiv, Photo, WikiCS, Roman-empire (K=10, 15, 20)ACC: 77.90 vs 75.35; 73.42 vs 72.43; 67.97 vs 66.44; 84.06 vs 82.72; 83.61 vs 82.03; 83.03 vs 81.19; 42.21 vs 41.02; 38.46 vsHelped
Add the negative entropy loss LENT (ablation)FedATH · Cora, PubMed, Photo, WikiCSACC: 73.59 -> 75.09; 69.52 -> 72.12; 62.44 -> 63.01; 82.42 -> 83.95; 81.51 -> 83.36; 80.80 -> 82.42; 87.19 -> 89.81; 86.04 ->Helped
Add the HSIC dependence loss LDEP (ablation)FedATH · Cora, PubMed, Photo, WikiCSACC: 73.59 -> 76.40; 69.52 -> 72.92; 62.44 -> 66.29; 82.42 -> 83.78; 81.51 -> 83.29; 80.80 -> 82.44; 87.19 -> 89.24; 86.04 ->Helped
Share the edge evaluator with other clients (CG+EE) instead of sharing only the causal GNN (ablation)FedATH · Cora, PubMed, Photo, WikiCSACC: 77.90 -> 78.69; 73.42 -> 73.34; 67.97 -> 67.02; 84.06 -> 83.23; 83.61 -> 83.01; 83.03 -> 81.77; 90.33 -> 86.96; 88.61 ->Hurt
Share the biased GNN with other clients (CG+BG) instead of sharing only the causal GNN (ablation)FedATH · Cora, PubMed, Photo, WikiCSACC: 77.90 -> 76.59; 73.42 -> 73.17; 67.97 -> 66.45; 84.06 -> 83.16; 83.61 -> 82.94; 83.03 -> 82.53; 90.33 -> 86.87; 88.61 ->Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Cora PubMed ogbn-arxiv Photo WikiCS Roman-empire

Benchmarks: Cora PubMed ogbn-arxiv Photo WikiCS Roman-empire

Metrics: ACC F1

Baselines: FedAvg FedProx MOON FedOPT FedProto FedSage+ FGSSL FedPUB FedTAD

Builds on: FedAvg FedTAD FGSSL FedPUB

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy