atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Clustering

Mixture of Experts as Representation Learner for Deep Multi-View Clustering

AAAI 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Clustering · approach: Incomplete multi-view clustering · 13 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes DMVC-CE, a mixture-of-experts representation learner with top-K gating, an equilibrium loss, and a kernel-based distinctiveness enhancer for deep multi-view clustering, evaluated on five multi-view benchmarks.

Problem

Deep multi-view clustering methods either use separate per-view feature extractors that limit cross-view collaboration or a single shared module that fails to capture view-specific representations.

Approach

Uses a mixture-of-experts as a unified representation learner in which a gating network dynamically selects top-K experts per sample across views, regularized by an equilibrium loss for balanced expert usage and a pairwise Gaussian-kernel distinctiveness loss for expert diversity.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use DMVC-CE instead of the strongest reported baselineMVC methods · ALOIACC: 83.43±2.41 -> 91.54±0.59Helped
Use DMVC-CE instead of the strongest reported baselineMVC methods · Caltech101-allACC: 36.65±0.00 -> 42.54±1.99Helped
Use DMVC-CE instead of the strongest reported baselineMVC methods · NUS-WIDEACC: 39.88±2.50 -> 54.08±1.03Helped
Use DMVC-CE instead of the strongest reported baselineMVC methods · HWACC: 83.45±2.31 -> 98.75±1.01Helped
Use DMVC-CE instead of the strongest reported baselineMVC methods · BDGPACC: 75.92±0.00 -> 80.82±0.30Helped
Replace separate view-specific extractors with a shared MoE learner (ablation)DMVC-CE · ALOIACC: 54.90±2.42 -> 91.54±0.59Helped
Add equilibrium loss to balance expert selection (ablation)DMVC-CE · ALOIACC: 87.67±1.71 -> 91.54±0.59Helped
Add distinctiveness enhancer to encourage expert diversity (ablation)DMVC-CE · ALOIACC: 84.02±4.19 -> 91.54±0.59Helped
Add equilibrium loss and distinctiveness enhancer (ablation)DMVC-CE · ALOIACC: 80.82±5.43 -> 91.54±0.59Helped
Add equilibrium loss to balance expert selection (ablation)DMVC-CE · HWACC: 93.97±4.52 -> 98.75±1.01Helped
Add distinctiveness enhancer to encourage expert diversity (ablation)DMVC-CE · HWACC: 93.37±5.10 -> 98.75±1.01Helped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ALOI Caltech101-all NUS-WIDE HW BDGP

Benchmarks: ALOI Caltech101-all NUS-WIDE HW BDGP

Metrics: ACC NMI ARI

Baselines: k-means MLAN MMGC MCGC CGL CVCL RCAGL SCM OMVCDR

Builds on: Shazeer et al. 2017 sparsely-gated mixture of experts

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy