Research map / Graph learning / GNN architectures
HyperDefender: A Robust Framework for Hyperbolic GNNs
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Proposes HyperDefender, a two-stage framework that turns hyperbolic (HyLa) embeddings into Euclidean features and applies Euclidean graph defenses (e.g., Pro-GNN-style structure learning) to make hyperbolic GNNs robust to poisoning and random perturbations.
Problem
Hyperbolic GNNs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks and noise on hierarchical graphs, and existing Euclidean defenses do not handle hierarchical structure well, so robustness of Hy-GNNs is largely unexplored.
Approach
Learn HyLa random Laplacian features from hyperbolic embeddings and feed them with a learned clean adjacency into any Euclidean defense; Pro-HyLa jointly learns a denoised adjacency (sparsity, low-rank, feature smoothness regularizers) and an SGC-based hyperbolic model.
Key results
- On Airport at 10% RND perturbation, Pro-HyLa reaches 93.25% accuracy versus 68.89% for Pro-GNN and 60.30% for NoisyGNN.
- At 25% Mettack perturbation on Cora, the method surpasses HyLa-SGC and Pro-GNN by over 58% and 6% respectively (as reported in text).
- Pro-HyLa gives the lowest average hyperbolicity deviation on Airport, Disease and Cora under most attacks in Table 3, indicating partial restoration of hierarchy.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use HyperDefender hyperbolic defenses instead of Euclidean defenses or HyLa-SGC | Hy-GNN node classification · Airport, adversarial attacks | accuracy | Helped |
| Use Pro-HyLa | Hy-GNN node classification · Disease, adversarial attacks | accuracy | Helped |
| Use HyperDefender defenses | Hy-GNN node classification · Cora, adversarial attacks | accuracy | Mixed |
| Use Pro-HyLa | HyperDefender · Airport, attacked graphs | Gromov δ-hyperbolicity: 1.92; 1.83; 1.92 -> 1.75; 1.25; 1.08 | Helped |
Surprising findings
- Hy-GNNs such as HyLa-SGC are not inherently robust, and Euclidean defenses fail to handle hierarchical graphs well.
- Adversarial attacks measurably increase the Gromov delta-hyperbolicity of hierarchical graphs, degrading the hierarchy.
Limitations
- Gains are small or absent on Cora, a dataset with low hierarchy, where performance is comparable to Euclidean defenses.
- Evaluated only on three small datasets and a limited set of attacks (Mettack, random, RND).
- Hyperbolic optimization makes defense design difficult, as the paper notes; no theoretical guarantees are given.
Experimental setup
Datasets: Cora Disease Airport
Benchmarks: Cora Disease Airport
Metrics: node classification accuracy Gromov delta-hyperbolicity (Delta avg)
Baselines: Pro-GNN GNNGuard RWL-GNN GCN-Jaccard NoisyGNN HANG HyLa-SGC
Builds on: HyLa (Random Laplacian Features) Pro-GNN SGC HGCN GNNGuard
Closest papers by meaning
- HyperNear: Unnoticeable Node Injection Attacks on Hypergraph Neural Networks (ICML 2025 · similarity 0.87)
- Hypergraph Attacks via Injecting Homogeneous Nodes into Elite Hyperedges (AAAI 2025 · similarity 0.86)
- A Simple and Yet Fairly Effective Defense for Graph Neural Networks (AAAI 2024 · similarity 0.84)
- Robustness Inspired Graph Backdoor Defense (ICLR 2025 · similarity 0.84)
- Residual Hyperbolic Graph Convolution Networks (AAAI 2024 · similarity 0.84)
- Improved Expressivity of Hypergraph Neural Networks through High-Dimensional Generalized Weisfeiler-Leman Algorithms (ICML 2025 · similarity 0.84)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
