atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Attacks on text and graphs

HyperNear: Unnoticeable Node Injection Attacks on Hypergraph Neural Networks

ICML 2025 · Adversarial robustness and security › Attacks on text and graphs · approach: Graph neural network robustness

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes HyperNear, a black-box node injection attack on hypergraph neural networks that uses a feature-based homophily constraint to keep injected nodes stealthy while degrading node classification accuracy.

Problem

Hypergraph neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, but security research has largely ignored hypergraph-specific structure; naive node injection attacks noticeably disrupt hypergraph homophily and are easy to detect.

Approach

Injects new nodes with perturbed features into randomly selected hyperedges, then refines hyperedge connections by adversarial gradient-based splitting, while penalizing changes in feature-based hypergraph homophily so the attack stays unnoticeable.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
HyperNear node injection attack vs. random injectionUniSAGE and other HNNs · Cora-CA, DBLP-CA, Citeseer, Cora, Pubmedclassification accuracy (%): e.g., Cora-CA 74.13 clean -> 60.24 (HyperNear) vs 73.86 (Random)Helped
Random node injectionUniSAGE · Coraclassification accuracy (%): 67.44 clean -> 67.38 randomNo clear effect
HyperNear vs FGA and NDA baselinesHNN victims in black-box setting · five datasetsclassification accuracy (%): HyperNear lowest accuracy on most dataset/victim pairs (e.g., Citeseer UniSAGE 47.47 vs FGA 58.69)Helped
HyperNear transfer to unseen architecturesHyperGCN, HGNN, ED-HNN, UniGCNII · Cora, DBLP-CA, Pubmedclassification accuracy (%): Cora: HGNN 79.01 -> 52.19; HyperGCN 73.25 -> 49.56Helped
Homophily-preserving constraint in HyperNearHyperNear · Cora, Cora-CA, Pubmed, DBLP-CAhomophily ratio stabilityNo clear effect
Reduce injection rate to alpha=1% (ablation)HyperNear · Pubmed, Cora (UniGAT)detectability via t-SNE distribution: After attack acc. 63.67% (Pubmed) and 53.89% (Cora)Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Cora Cora-CA CiteSeer DBLP-CA PubMed

Benchmarks: Cora Cora-CA CiteSeer DBLP-CA PubMed

Metrics: classification accuracy homophily ratio

Baselines: Random injection Node Degree Attack Fast Gradient Attack

Builds on: Fast Gradient Attack UniGNN HyperGCN ED-HNN

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy