Research map / 3D vision / Face and shape
M-plicits: Neural Implicit Surfaces via Nested Multiscale Residuals
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Proposes M-plicits, a residual sum of SIRENs trained on nested narrow bands around previous zero-level sets, with multiscale sphere tracing and GEMM-based analytical normals for real-time SDF rendering and noise-robust surface reconstruction.
Problem
Implicit neural surface representations (SDFs from oriented point clouds) struggle to jointly balance training efficiency, rendering speed, and robustness to input noise; single large MLPs are costly at inference, grid-based models overfit noise, and prior multiscale methods capture noise via hard s
Approach
Model the SDF as a sum of residual SIRENs, each supervised only within a narrow band around the previous level's zero set (nested neighborhoods), so the coarse network acts as a low-pass prior; pair this with multiscale sphere tracing, adaptive marching cubes, and GEMM-based analytical normals.
Key results
- Ours coarse achieves best mean Chamfer distance (5.36E-05) with 17,153 parameters and 180 FPS vs iNGP coarse 6.87E-05 with about 2.0M parameters.
- Ours fine achieves best median CD (1.87E-05) and best mean IoU (0.586) and median IoU (0.867) on Stanford+Thingi32.
- Under 1% vertex noise, the method's mean CD stays stable (3.36E-05) while IDF's mean CD inflates to 8.37E-02 due to outliers.
Surprising findings
- Screened Poisson reconstruction attains the best mean IoU on clean data (0.910) but degrades to 0.416 under 1% noise, while M-plicits holds 0.687.
- Heavy outlier contamination (1% stray points) collapses M-plicits IoU on Lucy to 0.002 because the max-based band width inflates.
Limitations
- Smoothness prevents very sharp edges.
- Max-based band width is sensitive to isolated outlier points; heavy outlier contamination degrades reconstruction.
- Thingi32 failure cases (non-watertight, multi-component, thin structures) inflate mean error; BANF comparison relies on a custom re-implementation.
Experimental setup
Datasets: Stanford Thingi32
Benchmarks: Stanford Thingi32
Metrics: Chamfer distance IoU Hausdorff distance FPS sampling time parameter count
Baselines: iNGP BACON IDF BANF Screened Poisson reconstruction SIREN
Builds on: SIREN Eikonal regularization instant-ngp BACON implicit displacement fields
Closest papers by meaning
- Flatten Anything: Unsupervised Neural Surface Parameterization (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.87)
- PhyRecon: Physically Plausible Neural Scene Reconstruction (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.85)
- GeoSVR: Taming Sparse Voxels for Geometrically Accurate Surface Reconstruction (NeurIPS 2025 · similarity 0.85)
- Implicit-ARAP: Efficient Handle-Guided Neural Field Deformation via Local Patch Meshing (NeurIPS 2025 · similarity 0.84)
- How Learnable Grids Recover Fine Detail in Low Dimensions: A Neural Tangent Kernel Analysis of Multigrid Parametric Encodings (ICLR 2025 · similarity 0.84)
- High Resolution UDF Meshing via Iterative Networks (NeurIPS 2025 · similarity 0.84)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
