atlas

Research map / Multi-agent systems and games / LLM agents

$\chi$-Bench: Can AI Agents Automate End-to-End, Long-Horizon, Policy-Rich Healthcare Workflows?

NeurIPS 2026 · Multi-agent systems and games › LLM agents · approach: Agentic benchmarks and orchestration · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces χ-Bench, a high-fidelity simulated healthcare operations benchmark (PA, UM, CM) with 20 apps via 87 MCP tools and a 1,279-document handbook skill, showing frontier agents resolve at most 28% of tasks.

Problem

Current benchmarks do not test whether AI agents can automate end-to-end, long-horizon, policy-dense healthcare administrative workflows involving multi-role handoffs and multi-turn dialogues with humans.

Approach

A simulator-based benchmark where agents drive full prior-authorization, utilization-management, and care-management cases through MCP tools, guided by a large managed-care operations handbook skill, scored in-situ by a deterministic contract plus rubric LLM judge.

Key results

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Managed-Care Operations Handbook (1,279 documents) simulated patient charts (~5,000 chart activities, 50 patients)

Benchmarks: χ-Bench

Metrics: pass@1 pass@3 pass^3 cost steps marathon pass@1 E2E arena pass@1

Baselines: HealthAdminBench tau2-Bench TheAgentCompany AgentClinic MedChain

Builds on: Agent Skills MCP tau-bench HealthAdminBench

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy