atlas

Research map / Multi-agent systems and games / LLM agents

Theory of Mind and Persuasion Beyond Conversation: Assessing the Capacity of LLMs to Induce Belief States via Planning and Action

NeurIPS 2026 · Multi-agent systems and games › LLM agents · approach: Self-evolving language agent learning · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces NCP-ToM and the NCP-ExploreToM framework to test whether LLM agents can induce target belief states through non-conversational actions, finding GPT-5 is the only model to beat humans but is less robust than them.

Problem

Existing LLM theory-of-mind benchmarks use passive question answering, leaving unmeasured whether agents can plan physical actions that induce specific (true or false) belief states in other agents without conversational persuasion.

Approach

Subverts the classic Sally-Anne style false-belief task: models are given a belief-state goal for a character and must plan object moves or direct characters into rooms to make that goal hold, evaluated in an agentic setting against human participants.

Key results

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: NCP-ExploreToM

Benchmarks: NCP-ExploreToM

Metrics: task success rate

Baselines: Human participants

Builds on: Sally-Anne false belief task ExploreToM

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy