atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Bayesian optimization

Expensive Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization Based on Diffusion Models

AAAI 2025 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Bayesian optimization · approach: Multi-objective Bayesian optimization · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes CDM-PSL, a composite (conditional + unconditional) diffusion-model Pareto set learning method for expensive multi-objective Bayesian optimization, using entropy-weighted surrogate gradients to guide sampling.

Problem

Pareto set learning in expensive multi-objective Bayesian optimization is unstable with limited function evaluations, making it hard to model complex Pareto set distributions from few samples.

Approach

Replace the Pareto set learning model with a composite diffusion model: an unconditional diffusion model for diverse offspring and a conditional diffusion model whose denoising is guided by entropy-weighted gradients of GP surrogates, combined with HV-based operator switching and batch selection.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add entropy-weighted gradients instead of mean-weighted gradients (ablation)CDM-PSL · ZDT1, ZDT2, ZDT3, DTLZ3, DTLZ6, DTLZ7HV: 4.9542e+00 -> 5.6570e+00; 5.4062e+00 -> 6.1533e+00; 4.2659e+00 -> 5.1703e+00; 1.0391e+10 -> 1.0795e+10; 4.3509e+03 -> 4.Helped
add conditional generation (ablation)CDM-PSL · ZDT1, ZDT2, ZDT3, DTLZ3, DTLZ6, DTLZ7HV: 4.9587e+00 -> 5.6570e+00; 5.1008e+00 -> 6.1533e+00; 4.1583e+00 -> 5.1703e+00; 1.0420e+10 -> 1.0795e+10; 4.2265e+03 -> 4.Helped
use the diffusion-model-based Pareto set learner instead of GA with SBX (ablation)CDM-PSL · ZDT1, ZDT2, ZDT3, DTLZ3, DTLZ6, DTLZ7HV: 3.6577e+00 -> 5.6570e+00; 3.7327e+00 -> 6.1533e+00; 3.7185e+00 -> 5.1703e+00; 9.6465e+09 -> 1.0795e+10; 2.2088e+03 -> 4.Helped
add the operator-switching strategy (ablation)CDM-PSL · ZDT3 and DTLZ3HV convergence performanceHelped
vary the diffusion step count from the default t=25 (ablation)CDM-PSL · synthetic benchmarksHV convergence performanceMixed
vary the learning rate from the default lr=0.001 (ablation)CDM-PSL · d=20 benchmarksHVNo clear effect
increase the conditional-generation proportion above the default CG-to-UG ratio of 1 to 10 (ablation)CDM-PSL · d=20 benchmarksHVMixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ZDT1 ZDT2 ZDT3 DTLZ2 DTLZ3 DTLZ4 DTLZ5 DTLZ6 DTLZ7 RE1-RE7 real-world engineering problems

Benchmarks: ZDT1 ZDT2 ZDT3 DTLZ2 DTLZ3 DTLZ4 DTLZ5 DTLZ6 DTLZ7 RE1 RE2 RE3

Metrics: hypervolume gap

Baselines: NSGA-II MOEA/D-EGO TSEMO USeMO-EI DGEMO PSL-MOBO qNParEGO qEHVI qNEHVI

Builds on: PSL-MOBO DDOM EmoDM shift-based density estimation

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy