atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Fairness

Strategic Causal Policy Learning: Welfare, Safety, and Fairness Thresholds

NeurIPS 2026 · Learning theory and algorithms › Fairness · approach: Causal and policy fairness in decisions

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's abstract only. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Shows that the standard treat-if-nonnegative-CATE rule can fail when agents strategically manipulate covariates that determine treatment eligibility, creating a mismatch between assigned treatment and baseline welfare.

Problem

Causal policy learning typically assumes covariates used for treatment assignment are unmanipulated; when agents can move or misreport covariates after a policy is announced, treatment is assigned on manipulated covariates while welfare depends on baseline CATEs, so the standard rule can misallocate

Approach

Formalizes strategic manipulation of covariates in causal policy learning and derives policy rules (with welfare, safety, and fairness thresholds) that account for the mismatch between manipulated eligibility and baseline treatment effects, rather than thresholding CATE at zero.

Key results

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: welfare

Baselines: treat-if-nonnegative-CATE rule

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy