atlas

Research map / Optimization / Implicit bias and generalization

Analyzing Neural Scaling Laws in Two-Layer Networks with Power-Law Data Spectra

ICLR 2025 · Optimization › Implicit bias and generalization · approach: Neural tangent kernel analysis · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Uses statistical-mechanics ODEs for one-pass SGD in a two-layer student-teacher committee machine with power-law data covariance spectra, deriving generalization-error scaling in time, feature number, and plateau length for linear and erf activations.

Problem

Theoretical understanding of neural scaling laws (power-law generalization error vs. training time, data/feature count) is limited; prior analyses mostly used random feature or linear models with isotropic or simple data.

Approach

Extends the statistical-mechanics online-learning hierarchy of ODEs for two-layer networks trained with one-pass SGD to power-law covariance spectra with L distinct eigenvalues, closing the hierarchy via Cayley-Hamilton; derives power-law decay of error in time, plateau length dependence on L, and a transition from exponential to power-law convergence.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Increase the number of distinct covariance eigenvaluesNonlinear student-teacher network with a power-law spectrum · Power-law spectrumplateau lengthHurt
Increase the number of distinct covariance eigenvaluesStudent-teacher network with a power-law spectrum · Power-law spectrumasymptotic convergence speedHurt
Train more input features (increase N_l)Linear student-teacher network · Power-law spectrumasymptotic generalization error: ε_{g,\mathrm{asymp}} \sim \frac{1}{N_l^\beta}Helped
Increase the number of distinct eigenvalues LNonlinear student-teacher network in the large-M, large-L regime · Power-law spectrumplateau escape time: τ_{\mathrm{esc}} \sim \frac{M^2}{\eta L}Helped
Use the exact solution instead of the small learning rate approximationLinear student-teacher network · Power-law spectrumgeneralization errorHurt
Use a power-law covariance spectrum rather than isotropic input correlationsStudent-teacher network · Power-law spectrumconvergence regimeMixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-5m

Benchmarks: CIFAR-5m

Metrics: generalization error

Builds on: Saad and Solla online learning Gaussian equivalence property Bordelon et al. random feature scaling

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy