atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Recognition and long-tail

CDE-Learning: Camera Deviation Elimination Learning for Unsupervised Person Re-identification

AAAI 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Recognition and long-tail · approach: Supervised person re-identification · 6 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes CDE-Learning, an unsupervised person Re-ID framework that aligns camera-domain centroids before DBSCAN clustering, uses a camera-PK multi-prototype contrastive loss, and adds a same-camera prediction auxiliary task.

Problem

Unsupervised person re-identification suffers from camera-induced feature deviations (contrast, saturation, resolution) that cause false positives in pseudo-label assignment and require hand-tuned camera constraint hyperparameters.

Approach

Refines features by shifting each camera domain toward the global centroid before clustering (CDC), unifies intra- and inter-camera contrastive constraints into one loss built from a multi-prototype dictionary without extra hyperparameter tuning (CDB), and adds a binary same-camera prediction auxiliary task (CAA).

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add CDC to the baseline (ablation)CDE-Learning · Market-1501mAP: 82.8 to 86.1Helped
Add CDC to the baseline (ablation)CDE-Learning · MSMT17mAP: 33.0 to 40.4Helped
Add CDB to the baseline (ablation)CDE-Learning · Market-1501mAP: 82.8 to 85.4Helped
Add CAA to the baseline (ablation)CDE-Learning · MSMT17mAP: 33.0 to 36.5Helped
Use CDC, CDB, and CAA together (ablation)CDE-Learning · Market-1501mAP: 82.8 to 87.4Helped
Use CDC, CDB, and CAA together (ablation)CDE-Learning · MSMT17mAP: 33.0 to 43.4Helped
Replace deviation balancing loss with inter-camera loss (ablation)CDE-Learning · Market-1501mAP: 87.4 -> 85.3Hurt
Replace deviation balancing loss with intra-camera loss (ablation)CDE-Learning · Market-1501mAP: 87.4 -> 86.1Hurt
Fine-tune separate intra- and inter-camera losses instead of using deviation balancing loss (ablation)CDE-Learning · Market-1501mAP: 87.4 -> 86.9Hurt
Concatenate random feature pairs instead of same-pseudo-label pairs (ablation)CAA · Market-1501mAP: 87.4 -> 86.8Hurt
Vary temperature τ (ablation)CDE-Learning · Market-1501mAP: 83.9, 86.5, 87.4, 86.1, 84.8, 82.3Mixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Market-1501 MSMT17 PersonX CUHK03

Benchmarks: Market-1501 MSMT17 PersonX CUHK03

Metrics: mAP Rank-1 Rank-5 Rank-10

Baselines: JVTC IICS CAP ICE PPLR CDR NPSS HCACE CGC MCRN SECRET CCL

Builds on: DBSCAN MoCo PK sampling ICE PPLR

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy