atlas

Research map / Point clouds / Segmentation and detection

Multimodality Helps Few-shot 3D Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation

ICLR 2025 · Point clouds › Segmentation and detection · approach: Point cloud semantic segmentation · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes MM-FSS, a cost-free multimodal few-shot 3D point cloud segmentation model that uses textual class names explicitly and 2D image features implicitly (via LSeg-aligned pretraining), with MCF/MSF fusion and a test-time adaptive calibration (TACC).

Problem

Few-shot 3D point cloud semantic segmentation relies only on unimodal point clouds, ignoring readily available modalities such as class names and paired 2D images.

Approach

Use a shared Stratified Transformer backbone with an intermodal head (aligned to LSeg 2D features during pretraining) and a unimodal head, fuse their prototype correlations (MCF), refine them with LSeg text-embedding semantic guidance weighted per point and class (MSF), and calibrate test predictions with an episode-adaptive IoU-based indicator (TACC).

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use MM-FSS instead of COSeg†few-shot point cloud segmentation · S3DIS and ScanNet, all 1/2-way and 1/5-shot settingsmIoU (%): +4.53% and +8.58% on S3DIS 1/2-way; +3.41% and +9.92% on ScanNet 1/2-wayHelped
Add MCF to MM-FSS without fusion modules (ablation)MM-FSS · ScanNet 1-way 1-shotmIoU (%): 40.69 -> 41.45Helped
Add MSF to MM-FSS without fusion modules (ablation)MM-FSS · ScanNet 1-way 1-shotmIoU (%): 40.69 -> 42.21Helped
Combine MCF and MSF (ablation)MM-FSS · ScanNet 1-way 1-shot and 1-way 5-shotmIoU (%): 42.21 -> 42.83; 46.46 -> 48.04Helped
Add the UF head alongside the IF head (ablation)MM-FSS · ScanNet 1-way 1-shotmIoU (%): 35.10 -> 42.83Helped
Add TACC (ablation)MM-FSS with IF and UF heads · ScanNet 1-way 1-shot and 1-way 5-shotmIoU (%): 42.83 -> 44.73; 48.04 -> 50.07Helped
Increase MSF blocks from 3 to 5 (ablation)MM-FSS without TACC · ScanNet 1-way 1-shotmIoU (%): 43.33 -> 44.69Helped
Add image modality to the 3D-only model, then add text modality (ablation)MM-FSS · ScanNet 1-way 1-shotmIoU (%): 40.69 -> 41.45 -> 44.73Helped
Replace adaptive TACC coefficient with fixed 1:1 or 1:0.5 coefficients (ablation)MM-FSS · ScanNet 1-way 1-shotmIoU (%): 44.73 vs 43.76; 44.73 vs 43.24Hurt
Use dynamic point-category weighting instead of linear MSF weighting (ablation)MM-FSS · ScanNet 1-way 1-shot and 1-way 5-shotmIoU (%): 40.80 -> 42.83; 45.79 -> 48.04Helped
Use OpenSeg instead of LSeg for pretraining (ablation)MM-FSS · ScanNet few-shot settingsmIoU (%): 43.47 vs 44.73 (1-way 1-shot mean); 47.09 vs 45.48 (1-way 5-shot split 1)Mixed
Aggregate 5-shot adaptive indicators with min instead of mean (ablation)MM-FSS TACC · ScanNet 1-way 5-shot, split 0mIoU (%): 55.46 -> 54.00Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: S3DIS ScanNet

Benchmarks: S3DIS ScanNet

Metrics: mIoU

Baselines: AttMPTI QGE QGPA COSeg COSeg†

Builds on: COSeg Stratified Transformer LSeg KPConv

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy