atlas

Research map / Point clouds / Segmentation and detection

Generalized Few-shot 3D Point Cloud Segmentation with Vision-Language Model

CVPR 2025 · Point clouds › Segmentation and detection · approach: Point cloud semantic segmentation · 12 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes GFS-VL, a generalized few-shot 3D point cloud segmentation framework that fuses noisy dense pseudo-labels from 3D VLMs (RegionPLC, OpenScene) with few-shot support samples via prototype-guided pseudo-label selection, adaptive infilling, and novel-base mixing, and introduces two new benchmarks on ScanNet200 and ScanNet++.

Problem

Generalized few-shot 3D point cloud segmentation must segment both base and novel classes after adapting with few support samples, but prototype-based methods are limited by sparse few-shot knowledge and current benchmarks have very few novel classes.

Approach

Use a 3D vision-language model's dense novel-class pseudo-labels as supervision, filtered by few-shot support prototypes (pseudo-label selection), completed via adaptive prototypes (adaptive infilling), and augmented with a context-preserving novel-base mix that embeds support samples into training scenes.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use GFS-VL instead of GWGFS-PCS · ScanNet200 5-shotHM: 14.55 -> 43.12Helped
Use GFS-VL instead of GWGFS-PCS · ScanNet200 1-shotHM: 11.56 -> 40.92Helped
Use GFS-VL instead of GWGFS-PCS · ScanNet++ 5-shotHM: 18.15 -> 31.82Helped
Use GFS-VL instead of GWGFS-PCS · ScanNet++ 1-shotHM: 11.59 -> 29.47Helped
Use GFS-VL instead of GWGFS-PCS · ScanNet 5-shotHM: 25.39 -> 61.91Helped
Use GFS-VL instead of GWGFS-PCS · ScanNet 1-shotHM: 21.55 -> 60.88Helped
Add pseudo-label selection to raw 3D VLM pseudo-label training (ablation)GFS-VL · ScanNet200 5-shotHM: 33.28 -> 38.35Helped
Add adaptive infilling to pseudo-label selection (ablation)GFS-VL · ScanNet200 5-shotHM: 38.35 -> 39.39Helped
Add novel-base mix to pseudo-label selection and adaptive infilling (ablation)GFS-VL · ScanNet200 5-shotHM: 39.39 -> 43.22Helped
Adapt RegionPLC using GFS-VL instead of zero-shot prediction (ablation)RegionPLC · ScanNet200 5-shotHM: 31.56 -> 43.22Helped
Adapt OpenScene using GFS-VL instead of zero-shot prediction (ablation)OpenScene · ScanNet200 5-shotHM: 23.58 -> 31.07Helped
Set adaptive infilling threshold δ to 0.90 instead of the tested alternatives (ablation)GFS-VL · ScanNet200 5-shotHM: 41.77, 42.24, 43.22, 41.94Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ScanNet200 ScanNet ScanNet++ S3DIS

Benchmarks: ScanNet200 ScanNet++ ScanNet

Metrics: mIoU-B mIoU-N mIoU-A HM

Baselines: PIFS attMPTI COSeg GW CAPL Fully Supervised

Builds on: GW CAPL Mix3D RegionPLC Point Transformer V3

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy