Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Uncertainty and Gaussian processes
Bayesian Experimental Design Via Contrastive Diffusions
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Introduces CoDiff, a single-loop gradient-based BOED method using a pooled posterior and diffusion-based samplers to maximize expected information gain, enabling data-based BOED with generative priors.
Problem
Expected information gain (EIG) maximization for Bayesian optimal experimental design is doubly intractable and computationally expensive in high-dimensional and sequential settings, and prior work could not handle priors available only through samples.
Approach
Derives a new EIG gradient expression using a pooled posterior (logarithmic pooling of posteriors over sampled outcomes) as importance proposal, and couples sampling and design optimization in a single bi-level loop, with diffusion models supplying conditional samplers for data-based priors.
Key results
- On source localization, CoDiff improves SPCE by about 30% over the non-myopic RL-BOED baseline and yields Wasserstein distances about two orders of magnitude lower.
- On MNIST image reconstruction, CoDiff reaches SSIM 0.826 after 6 experiments versus 0.463 for random designs.
- Source localization experiments were repeated over 100 random rollouts with N+M=400 samples; each measurement step takes 2.9 s.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| use CoDiff instead of random design selection | Sequential MNIST image reconstruction with 7×7 masks · Image reconstruction, measures 1–6 | SSIM: .168 -> .227; .275 -> .338; .350 -> .528; .391 -> .673; .421 -> .789; .463 -> .826 | Helped |
| use CoDiff instead of RL-BOED | Sequential source localization · Source localization | SPCE: 30% | Helped |
| use CoDiff instead of the compared methods | Sequential source localization · Source localization | L₂ Wasserstein distance | Helped |
Surprising findings
- Greedy (myopic) design via CoDiff outperforms the long-sighted reinforcement learning procedure RL-BOED on the density-based source localization task.
Limitations
- Greedy approach; not non-myopic.
- Requires explicit likelihood expression.
- Diffusion-based inverse problem handling limited to linear forward models.
Experimental setup
Datasets: MNIST
Benchmarks: source localization (sequential BOED, 30 experiments) MNIST image reconstruction from 7x7 masks
Metrics: SPCE SNMC L2 Wasserstein distance SSIM
Baselines: RL-BOED VPCE PASOA SMC Random design
Builds on: implicit diffusion diffusive Gibbs sampling sampling-as-optimization Donsker-Varadhan variational formula score-based inverse problem solvers (FPS)
Closest papers by meaning
- On Estimating the Gradient of the Expected Information Gain in Bayesian Experimental Design (AAAI 2024 · similarity 0.90)
- Posterior Inference with Diffusion Models for High-dimensional Black-box Optimization (ICML 2025 · similarity 0.89)
- Bayesian Adaptive Calibration and Optimal Design (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.87)
- Informed Initialization for Bayesian Optimization and Active Learning (NeurIPS 2025 · similarity 0.87)
- PASOA- PArticle baSed Bayesian Optimal Adaptive design (ICML 2024 · similarity 0.87)
- Nesting Particle Filters for Experimental Design in Dynamical Systems (ICML 2024 · similarity 0.86)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
