atlas

Research map / Optimization / Optimizers

On Estimating the Gradient of the Expected Information Gain in Bayesian Experimental Design

AAAI 2024 · Optimization › Optimizers · approach: Stochastic gradient MCMC · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes two estimators of the gradient of expected information gain for Bayesian experimental design: UEEG-MCMC (posterior MCMC samples) and BEEG-AP (atomic priors with sample reuse), with theory linking BEEG-AP to srNMC.

Problem

Optimizing expected information gain (EIG) for Bayesian experimental design requires gradients of EIG w.r.t. design variables, which are hard to estimate accurately and efficiently when the marginal likelihood is intractable and EIG values are large.

Approach

Derives a posterior-expected representation of the EIG gradient (using the tractable likelihood score in place of the intractable marginal score), then estimates it either with MCMC posterior samples (UEEG-MCMC) or with a finite set of reused parameter samples as atomic priors (BEEG-AP), which equals the gradient of the srNMC estimator.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use UEEG-MCMC instead of BEEG-AP or the other compared methodsToy algebraic model · small noise (large EIG)posterior entropyHelped
use BEEG-AP or UEEG-MCMC instead of ACE, PCE, or GradBEDToy algebraic model · small noise (large EIG)posterior entropyHelped
use BEEG-AP or UEEG-MCMC for design optimizationToy algebraic model · large noisedesign qualityHelped
use BEEG-AP instead of the other compared methodsPK model · small EIGconvergence rateHelped
use UEEG-MCMC instead of the other compared methodsPK model · large EIGposterior entropyHelped
use ACE with a posterior inference networkPK model · large EIGposterior inference network learningHurt
use BEEG-AP or UEEG-MCMC instead of the other compared methodsSTAT5 model · small EIGposterior entropyHelped
use UEEG-MCMC instead of BEEG-AP or the other compared methodsSTAT5 model · large EIGposterior entropyHelped
use BEEG-AP instead of GradBEDSTAT5 model · large EIGposterior entropyHurt
use ACESTAT5 model · small and large EIGdesign qualityHurt
use UEEG-MCMC instead of BEEG-AP or PCEEIG gradient estimation · Bayesian linear regression; increasing ground-truth EIGgradient estimation biasHelped
use BEEG-AP instead of PCEEIG gradient estimation · Bayesian linear regressiongradient estimation biasNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Benchmarks: Bayesian linear regression EIG gradient bias toy algebraic model PK model STAT5 model

Metrics: estimation bias EIG (NMC estimate) posterior entropy convergence vs. number of simulations

Baselines: PCE ACE GradBED

Builds on: nested Monte Carlo srNMC (sample reuse NMC) prior contrastive estimation adaptive contrastive estimation GradBED

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy