atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Recognition and long-tail

Biased Incomplete Multi-View Learning

AAAI 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Recognition and long-tail · approach: Incomplete multi-view multi-label learning · 5 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes RIML, a learning-free imputation framework for incomplete multi-view learning under class-dependent (biased) view-missing patterns, using OT-based inter-class association to calibrate view-specific Gaussians and a category-aware focal loss.

Problem

Incomplete multi-view learning where view-missing patterns depend on class (biased) rather than uniformly random, causing data-poor classes to have few samples and data-rich classes to have few views.

Approach

Use optimal transport between meta-classes and rare classes to learn a class-association matrix that calibrates view-specific Gaussian distributions, then impute missing views by sampling from these calibrated distributions; train with a focal loss plus a category-aware marginal term.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use RIML instead of CMP-NetsIncomplete multi-view classification · HandWritten, η = 0.3accuracy: 0.8615 ± 0.01 -> 0.9430 ± 0.02Helped
Use RIML instead of DeepIMVIncomplete multi-view classification · Scene15, η = 0.3accuracy: 0.4609 ± 0.02 -> 0.6425 ± 0.03Helped
Use RIML instead of CMP-NetsIncomplete multi-view classification · Animal, η = 0.3accuracy: 0.6630 ± 0.03 -> 0.7670 ± 0.02Helped
Use RIML instead of CMP-NetsIncomplete multi-view classification · YaleB, η = 0.3accuracy: 0.7172 ± 0.04 -> 0.8571 ± 0.01Helped
Use RIML instead of CMP-NetsIncomplete multi-view classification · BRCA, η = 0.3accuracy: 0.7760 ± 0.04 -> 0.8440 ± 0.01Helped
Add inter-class association calibration to distribution-sampling imputation (ablation)RIML · Five multi-view datasets, η = 0.3accuracyHelped
Replace standard focal loss with category-aware focal loss (ablation)RIML · Five multi-view datasets, η = 0.3accuracyHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: HandWritten Scene15 Animal YaleB BRCA

Benchmarks: HandWritten Scene15 Animal YaleB BRCA

Metrics: accuracy

Baselines: UIMC MIWAE CPSPAN DeepIMV CPM-Nets

Builds on: focal loss Sinkhorn algorithm few-shot distribution calibration

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy