atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Clustering

Incomplete Contrastive Multi-View Clustering with High-Confidence Guiding

AAAI 2024 · Learning theory and algorithms › Clustering · approach: Incomplete multi-view clustering · 109 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes ICMVC, an end-to-end incomplete multi-view clustering framework that transfers adjacency graphs across views, encodes incomplete data with GCNs, fuses views via instance-level attention, and uses contrastive and high-confidence self-training losses for joint clustering.

Problem

Incomplete multi-view clustering, where instances have missing views, and existing methods either ignore complementary information or treat missing-value handling and representation/clustering as separate stages.

Approach

Missing views' adjacency matrices are filled by transferring the graph from an observed view of the same instance; GCN message passing imputes missing representations; instance-level attention fusion plus a high-confidence target distribution (sharpened from max over view and fused assignments) guides an end-to-end clustering objective combined with instance-level and cluster-level contrastive los

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use ICMVC instead of the strongest reported baselineIncomplete multi-view clustering · MSRC-V1 (30% missing)ACC: 76.76 ± 6.37 -> 87.72 ± 0.47Helped
Use ICMVC instead of the strongest reported baselineIncomplete multi-view clustering · Scene-15 (30% missing)ACC: 31.90 ± 1.31 -> 36.20 ± 1.47Helped
Use ICMVC instead of the strongest reported baselineIncomplete multi-view clustering · LandUse-21 (30% missing)ACC: 24.80 ± 1.05 -> 26.94 ± 0.46Helped
Use ICMVC instead of the strongest reported baselineIncomplete multi-view clustering · HandWritten (30% missing)ACC: 76.61 ± 4.89 -> 82.34 ± 1.62Helped
Use ICMVC instead of the strongest reported baselineIncomplete multi-view clustering · Noisy MNIST (30% missing)ACC: 79.96 ± 2.23 -> 96.82 ± 0.11Helped
Add instance-level contrastive loss (ablation)ICMVC · MSRC-V1 (30% missing)ACC: 80.38 -> 87.72Helped
Add high-confidence guidance (ablation)ICMVC · MSRC-V1 (30% missing)ACC: 85.62 -> 87.72Helped
Add high-confidence guidance and clustering loss instead of using k-means (ablation)ICMVC · MSRC-V1 (30% missing)ACC: 70.67 -> 87.72Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: HandWritten Scene-15 LandUse-21 MSRC-V1 Noisy MNIST

Benchmarks: HandWritten Scene-15 LandUse-21 MSRC-V1 Noisy MNIST

Metrics: ACC NMI ARI

Baselines: BSV Concat PVC MIC DAIMC Completer DSIMVC DIMVC

Builds on: Contrastive Clustering DEC Completer DAIMC

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy