atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / Visual and representation RL

What Matters in Learning from Large-Scale Datasets for Robot Manipulation

ICLR 2025 · Reinforcement learning › Visual and representation RL · approach: Dexterous manipulation transfer · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Uses a procedural simulation data generator (MimicLabs, built on BDDL, LIBERO and MimicGen) to study which dataset diversity dimensions matter for collecting and retrieving robot demonstrations, validated with real-robot experiments on DROID retrieval.

Problem

Lack of a systematic understanding of what data should be collected for large-scale robot manipulation datasets and how practitioners should retrieve relevant demonstrations from existing datasets such as DROID for downstream policy learning.

Approach

Procedurally generate robot datasets with controlled dimensions of variation (camera pose, object/table texture, spatial arrangements, motion) using BDDL task specs and MimicGen demo synthesis, then run controlled collector and retriever co-training studies that isolate which DVs need alignment versus diversity.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Increase co-training camera-pose diversity (ablation)BC-RNN on clear table with misaligned camera poses · clear tablesuccess rate: 43.33 -> 90Helped
Increase co-training object-texture diversity (ablation)BC-RNN on clear table with misaligned object textures · clear tablesuccess rate: 93.33 -> 90No clear effect
Increase co-training table-texture diversity (ablation)BC-RNN on clear table with misaligned table textures · clear tablesuccess rate: 66.67 -> 63.33No clear effect
Increase co-training object-spatial diversity (ablation)BC-RNN on clear table with misaligned object spatial arrangements · clear tablesuccess rate: 26.67 -> 56.67Helped
Align retrieved camera poses with the target (ablation)BC-RNN · microwave mugsuccess rate: 46.67 -> 70Helped
Align retrieved camera poses with the target (ablation)BC-RNN · clear tablesuccess rate: 20 -> 36.67Helped
Retrieve aligned object textures (ablation)BC-RNN · microwave mugsuccess rate: 66.67, 73.33, 70No clear effect
Retrieve relevant object/skill demonstrations and align camera poses (ablation)BC-RNN · bin carrotsuccess rate: 50 -> 96.67Helped
Retrieve relevant object/skill demonstrations and align all listed dimensions (ablation)BC-RNN · bin bowlsuccess rate: 33.33 -> 73.33Helped
Retrieve relevant object/skill demonstrations (ablation)BC-RNN · clear table (10 target demos)success rate: 23.33 -> 20Hurt
Retrieve relevant object/skill demonstrations and align camera poses (ablation)BC-RNN · clear table (20 target demos)success rate: 36.67 -> 46.67Helped
Retrieve relevant object/skill demonstrations and align camera poses (ablation)BC-RNN · microwave teapot (20 target demos)success rate: 30 -> 50Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MimicLabs DROID

Benchmarks: MimicLabs clear table microwave mug bin carrot bin bowl microwave teapot make coffee

Metrics: task success rate

Baselines: Target only Full DROID co-training BC-RNN BC-Transformer

Builds on: MimicGen LIBERO BDDL Diffusion Policy DROID

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy