atlas

Research map / 3D vision / Face and shape

GALA: Geometry-Aware Local Adaptive Grids for Detailed 3D Generation

ICLR 2025 · 3D vision › Face and shape · approach: 3D shape generative modeling · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes GALA, a sparse forest-of-octrees 3D shape representation with oriented, anisotropically scaled local SDF grids, plus a cascaded diffusion pipeline for generating shapes from it.

Problem

Efficient, accurate 3D shape representations that capture fine geometric detail with few parameters and that are suitable for diffusion-based 3D generation.

Approach

Place a forest of octrees only on the object surface, and in each non-empty leaf fit a local SDF grid whose orientation comes from PCA of local normals and whose axes are anisotropically rescaled using a histogram of sampled points; the flattened grid configurations are then generated cascade-style with transformers and diffusion.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use local adaptive grids instead of uniform axis-aligned grid samplings (ablation)GALA · ShapeNet reconstruction (5 classes)CD (×10^-3): 1.52 -> 1.18Helped
add bounded-normal orientation to vanilla grid extraction (ablation)GALA · ShapeNet reconstruction testCD (×10^-3): 1.55 -> 1.33Helped
add histogram rescaling to bounded-normal orientation (ablation)GALA · ShapeNet reconstruction testCD (×10^-3): 1.33 -> 1.18Helped
add bounded-normal orientation to vanilla grid extraction (ablation)GALA · ShapeNet reconstruction testHD (×10^-2): 1.46 -> 1.19Helped
add histogram rescaling to bounded-normal orientation (ablation)GALA · ShapeNet reconstruction testHD (×10^-2): 1.19 -> 1.06Helped
quantize the local adaptive grid quantities during fitting (ablation)GALA with normals and histogram rescaling · ShapeNet reconstruction testCD (×10^-3): 1.08 -> 1.18Hurt
vary the subdivision overlap ratio and use α=0.2 (ablation)GALA · ShapeNet reconstruction testChamfer DistanceHelped
generate with GALA instead of the strongest reported baselineShapeNet airplane generation · ShapeNet airplaneMMD CD: 3.36 -> 2.48Helped
generate with GALA instead of Mosaic-SDFShapeNet chair generation · ShapeNet chairCOV EMD (%): 55.03 -> 53.10Hurt
generate with GALA instead of Mosaic-SDFShapeNet chair generation · ShapeNet chairMMD CD: 15.47 -> 13.28Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ShapeNet

Benchmarks: ShapeNet

Metrics: Chamfer Distance Light Field Distance Maximum Mean Discrepancy Coverage 1-nearest neighbor accuracy Earth Mover Distance fitting time parameter count

Baselines: 3DShape2VecSet Neural Wavelet MeshDiffusion Mosaic-SDF 3DILG DMTet

Builds on: Mosaic-SDF OBBTree DiT RePaint MeshGPT

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy