atlas

Research map / Image generation / Fast diffusion sampling

SymmetricDiffusers: Learning Discrete Diffusion on Finite Symmetric Groups

ICLR 2025 · Image generation › Fast diffusion sampling · approach: Diffusion theory and design space · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes SymmetricDiffusers, a discrete diffusion model over the finite symmetric group S_n using riffle-shuffle forward noising and a generalized Plackett-Luce reverse transition, evaluated on 4-digit MNIST sorting, jigsaw puzzles, and TSP.

Problem

Learning probability distributions over the finite symmetric group S_n is intractable due to factorial size and discreteness, and existing discrete diffusion models assume fixed small vocabularies and cannot handle it.

Approach

Discrete diffusion on S_n with riffle shuffles as the forward process (chosen via mixing-time theory), a generalized Plackett-Luce (GPL) reverse transition proven to be universal and more expressive than PL, and a theoretically motivated denoising schedule that merges reverse steps.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use SymmetricDiffusers instead of Error-free DiffSort4-digit MNIST sorting · sequence length 52Kendall-Tau: 0.170 -> 0.786Helped
Use SymmetricDiffusers instead of DiffSort4-digit MNIST sorting · sequence length 200Kendall-Tau: 0.107 -> 0.453Helped
Use SymmetricDiffusers instead of Gumbel-Sinkhorn NetworkNoisy MNIST jigsaw · 6×6Correct (%): 14.91 -> 18.54Helped
Use SymmetricDiffusers instead of Gumbel-Sinkhorn NetworkCIFAR-10 jigsaw · 4×4Kendall-Tau: 0.4016 -> 0.2518Hurt
Use SymmetricDiffusers instead of DIFUSCOTSP · TSP-20Optimality Gap (%): 1.07* -> 0.18Helped
Use SymmetricDiffusers instead of DIFUSCOTSP · TSP-50Optimality Gap (%): 0.10 -> 0.41Hurt
Replace GPL with inverse riffle shuffle (IRS) (ablation)SymmetricDiffusers with greedy decoding · sorting 52 four-digit MNIST imagesKendall-Tau: 0.799 -> 0.390Hurt
Replace beam search with greedy decoding (ablation)GPL reverse transition · sorting 52 four-digit MNIST imagesAccuracy (%): 27.4 -> 24.4Hurt
Replace GPL with PL while using beam search (ablation)SymmetricDiffusers · sorting 52 four-digit MNIST imagesAccuracy (%): 27.4 -> 26.4Hurt
Use inverse transposition (IT) with random-transposition forward diffusion (ablation)SymmetricDiffusers · sorting 52 four-digit MNIST imagesKendall-TauHurt
Use inverse insertion (II) with random-insertion forward diffusion (ablation)SymmetricDiffusers · sorting 52 four-digit MNIST imagesKendall-TauHurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MNIST Noisy MNIST CIFAR-10 TSP-20 TSP-50

Benchmarks: 4-digit MNIST sorting Noisy MNIST jigsaw CIFAR-10 jigsaw TSP-20 TSP-50

Metrics: Kendall-Tau accuracy correct (%) RMSE MAE tour length optimality gap

Baselines: Gumbel-Sinkhorn Network DiffSort Error-free DiffSort Concorde LKH-3 2-Opt GCN DIFUSCO SEDD

Builds on: Plackett-Luce GSR riffle shuffle model SEDD DiffSort Gumbel-Sinkhorn

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy