atlas

Research map / Image generation / Fast diffusion sampling

Scalable Discrete Diffusion Samplers: Combinatorial Optimization and Statistical Physics

ICLR 2025 · Image generation › Fast diffusion sampling · approach: Diffusion theory and learned samplers · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Scalable Discrete Diffusion Samplers (SDDS), with an RL/PPO-based reverse-KL training and a self-normalized NIS forward-KL training that avoid backprop through all diffusion steps, plus adaptations of SN-NIS and NMCMC for unbiased sampling with discrete diffusion models.

Problem

Diffusion samplers for discrete neural probabilistic optimization require backpropagation through the entire diffusion trajectory, so memory scales linearly with the number of steps; they also lack unbiased sampling methods because diffusion models only provide approximate likelihoods.

Approach

Reformulate the reverse-KL objective as an episodic RL problem optimized with PPO, and rewrite the forward-KL gradient with self-normalized neural importance sampling and Monte Carlo over diffusion steps, so that per-step mini-batching cuts memory; additionally adapt SN-NIS and NMCMC to diffusion path likelihoods for unbiased Ising sampling.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Train with SDDS: rKL w/ RL instead of DiffUCOGNN diffusion model · UCO test benchmarks, average solution qualitysolution qualityHelped
Train with SDDS: fKL w/ MC instead of SDDS: rKL w/ RLGNN diffusion model · UCO with 150 sampled solutionsbest solution qualityMixed
Use SDDS: fKL w/ MC instead of the AR reimplementationU-Net diffusion model · 24×24 Ising grid, βc=0.4407free energy estimate: -2.09344 \pm 0.00063 -> -2.11209 \pm 0.00008Helped
Apply conditional expectation in the final diffusion step (ablation)SDDS models · UCO test benchmarkssolution qualityNo clear effect
Add per-step probability clipping for asymptotically unbiased sampling (ablation)diffusion models · unbiased estimationestimation performanceNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: RB graphs (MIS, MaxCl) Barabasi-Albert graphs (MDS, MaxCut) 2D Ising model 24x24 lattice

Benchmarks: RB-small MIS RB-large MIS BA-small MDS BA-large MDS RB-small MaxCl BA-small MaxCut BA-large MaxCut 2D Ising 24x24 free energy/internal energy/entropy

Metrics: average independent set size dominating set size clique size cut size free energy internal energy entropy effective sample size per sample

Baselines: DiffUCO LTFT Gurobi VAN AR (autoregressive NIS) DiffUCO: CE

Builds on: DiffUCO Variational Annealing Proximal Policy Optimization Self-Normalized Neural Importance Sampling Neural MCMC

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy