atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / Policy gradient and actor-critic

Adaptive teachers for amortized samplers

ICLR 2025 · Reinforcement learning › Policy gradient and actor-critic · approach: Regularized scalable deep value learning · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a Teacher GFlowNet that adaptively samples high-loss regions of a Student amortized sampler (trained with trajectory balance) to improve mode coverage in off-policy training.

Problem

Exploration and mode coverage are poor when training amortized samplers (GFlowNets) with off-policy RL, since existing replay and perturbation methods only revisit modes near the current policy's samples.

Approach

An auxiliary Teacher GFlowNet is trained with a reward derived from the Student's trajectory-balance loss (weighted toward undersampled high-reward regions and mixed with the log reward), and its samples drive the Student's training, amortizing an ideal prioritized replay over the whole sample space.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Train the Student with an adaptive TeacherTB sampler · Deceptive grid world (d=2, H=256)# modes: 2165.2 -> 2452.6Helped
Train the Student with an adaptive TeacherTB sampler · Deceptive grid world (d=4, H=32)# modes: 120.4 -> 246.6Helped
Train the Student with an adaptive TeacherTB sampler · 25GMMEUBO: 1.833{ $\pm$2.366} -> 0.115{ $\pm$0.009}Helped
Train the Student with an adaptive TeacherTB sampler · ManywellEUBO: 210.440{ $\pm$6.888} -> 165.800{ $\pm$0.045}Helped
Use N_MC=3 instead of N_MC=1 to estimate the Teacher reward (ablation)Teacher · Deceptive grid world (d=2, H=256)# modes: $2452.6 \pm \text{ 21.7} -> $2489.6 \pm \text{ 15.8}No clear effect
Set C=0 instead of C=19 (ablation)Teacher · Deceptive grid world (d=2, H=256)L1 error: $0.94 \pm \text{ 0.03} -> $1.06 \pm \text{ 0.08}Hurt
Set C=0 instead of C=19 (ablation)Teacher · Deceptive grid world# modesMixed
Set α=0.5 instead of α=0.0 (ablation)Teacher · Deceptive grid world (d=4, H=32)# modes: $246.6 \pm \text{ 14.7} -> $85.6 \pm \text{ 8.5}Hurt
Set α=0.5 instead of α=0.0 (ablation)Teacher · 25GMMELBO: -0.144{ $\pm$0.001} -> -0.137{ $\pm$0.004}Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: QM9 sEH TFbind8 L14-RNA1 25GMM Manywell deceptive grid world

Benchmarks: deceptive grid world 25GMM Manywell QM9 sEH TFbind8 L14-RNA1

Metrics: number of modes discovered L1 distance ELBO ELBO-IS EUBO 2-Wasserstein distance

Baselines: on-policy TB epsilon-exploration GAFN PRT PER SMC GGNS PIS

Builds on: trajectory balance prioritized experience replay detailed balance GFlowNet local search GAFN

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy