atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / OOD and anomaly detection

MetaOOD: Automatic Selection of OOD Detection Models

ICLR 2025 · Label-efficient and robust learning › OOD and anomaly detection · approach: Provable and feature-based OOD detection · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes MetaOOD, a zero-shot unsupervised meta-learning framework that selects among 11 OOD detectors by regressing their historical AUROC from language-model embeddings of dataset and method descriptions with an XGBoost meta-predictor.

Problem

Selecting the best OOD detection model for a new image dataset pair without labels or test-time evaluation, which existing outlier-detection meta-learners do not handle well.

Approach

Treat OOD detector selection as a meta-learning regression: an XGBoost meta-predictor maps language-model embeddings of ID/OOD dataset descriptions and detector descriptions to historical AUROC, then picks the top predicted detector for a new dataset pair.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use MetaOOD instead of MetaOOD_0 with handcrafted meta-features and one-hot model embeddingsOOD detector selection · 24 OOD test dataset pairsselected detector performance rankHelped
Use BERT-based all-mpnet-base-v2 embeddings instead of LLM-generated embeddings (ablation)MetaOOD · 24 OOD test dataset pairsselected detector performance rankHelped
Use BERT-based language embeddings instead of handcrafted meta-features and one-hot model embeddings (ablation)MetaOOD · 24 OOD test dataset pairsselected detector performance rankHelped
Use XGBoost instead of a two-layer MLP meta-predictor (ablation)MetaOOD · 24 OOD test dataset pairsselected detector performance rankHelped
Combine statistical and landmarker meta-features with language embeddings (ablation)MetaOOD · 24 OOD test dataset pairsselected detector performance rankNo clear effect
Rephrase dataset descriptions while preserving their meaning (ablation)MetaOOD · 24 OOD test dataset pairsselected detector performance rankNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: CIFAR-10 CIFAR-100 ImageNet FashionMNIST MNIST Places365 SVHN Textures TIN SSB_hard NINCO iNaturalist

Benchmarks: MetaOOD testbed of 24 ID-OOD test dataset pairs

Metrics: AUROC of selected detector average rank among 12 methods Wilcoxon signed-rank p-value

Baselines: MSP ODIN Mega Ensemble Random selection Global Best ISAC ARGOSMART ALORS NCF MetaOOD_0 GPT-4o mini

Builds on: MetaOD ALORS ISAC ARGOSMART NCF

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy